Tissue microRNA Profiling Identifies Prognostic Signatures in Prostate Cancer and Highlights CPEB3 as a Candidate...

Purpose: Prostate cancer is one of the most common malignancies in men, yet current prognostic methods remain suboptimal. Emerging evidence indicates that microRNAs (miRNAs) play critical roles in prostate cancer progression. This study aimed to identify miRNAs associated with adverse clinical outcomes by comparing miRNA expression profiles between prostate tumors with unfavorable versus favorable prognostic features. Materials and Methods: High-throughput next-generation sequencing (NGS) was used to analyze miRNA expression in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded prostate cancer tissue samples. Patients were classified into favorable or unfavorable prognosis groups based on risk stratification scores, Gleason grade group, and biochemical recurrence. Differentially expressed miRNAs were identified using a fold-change threshold ≥2 and a false discovery rate (FDR) <0.05. Predicted target genes and pathway analyses were conducted to generate candidate regulatory hypotheses rather than confirm mechanistic relationships. Results: Several miRNAs were differentially expressed according to prognostic category. miR-206 was significantly downregulated in high-risk tumors compared with low-risk tumors. High-Gleason-grade tumors showed reduced expression of miR-7704 and miR-4454, while miR-25-3p and let-7f-5p were upregulated. In patients with early biochemical recurrence, miR-7704 and miR-10400-5p were downregulated relative to those with prolonged recurrence-free survival. Target prediction analysis identified CPEB3, HAND1, PTAR1, and SPRYD4 as shared candidate targets, with CPEB3 emerging as a prioritized candidate supported by consistency in external datasets rather than a confirmed molecular target. Conclusions: Distinct miRNA expression patterns correlate with prostate cancer aggressiveness and clinical outcomes. miR-206, miR-7704, miR-4454, miR-25-3p, and let-7f-5p represent candidate prognostic biomarkers. Their shared target CPEB3 should be interpreted as a prioritized candidate for future investigation. Given the very small sample size and the lack of qRT-PCR and functional validation, these findings should be considered preliminary and hypothesis-generating, requiring validation in larger independent cohorts and experimental studies.