Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 28, 2026

Ceramic Omnidirectional Bioprinting in Cell-Laden Suspensions for the Generation of Bone Analogs
10:19

Ceramic Omnidirectional Bioprinting in Cell-Laden Suspensions for the Generation of Bone Analogs

Published on: August 8, 2022

Nano-Based 3D Printed Scaffold for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Xiaoting Shi1, Keda Liu1, Weiqi Li1

  • 1Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, School and Hospital of Stomatology, China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)
|May 27, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Natural killer cell-mediated immunosurveillance modulates liver cancer evolution through cancer stemness enhancement and lipid metabolism reprogramming.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

TNF-α drives pancreatic microcirculatory dysfunction via CD8<sup>+</sup> T cell-mediated endothelial injury in severe acute pancreatitis.

Gut·2026
Same author

Systemic immune-inflammation index and its role in the relationship between subgingival microbiota and periodontal inflammation.

Journal of periodontology·2026
Same author

VCPIP1 drives diabetic cardiomyopathy by deubiquitinating AMPKγ1 and preventing AMPKα-γ subunit assembly in cardiomyocytes.

Signal transduction and targeted therapy·2026
Same author

Biocorrosion behavior of high-purity Mg and Mg-Zn-Zr-Nd alloy during exposure to Porphyromonas gingivalis.

Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces·2026
Same author

Machine learning-driven discovery of therapeutic nucleoside hydrogels for periodontitis.

International journal of oral science·2026
Same journal

Correction: Komatsu et al. Three-Dimensional Visualization and Detection of the Pulmonary Venous-Left Atrium Connection Using Artificial Intelligence in Fetal Cardiac Ultrasound Screening. <i>Bioengineering</i> 2026, <i>13</i>, 100.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Comparison of CO<sub>2</sub> Laser and Microdebrider in the Surgical Treatment of Pediatric Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis: A Retrospective Analysis.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Toward More Translational Tumor Models: Breast dECM-Based 3D Systems Capture Native Microenvironmental Cues.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Postural Stability Changes During the 4 Phases of the Half Squat: Kinematics Profile of the Center of Pressure and Center of Mass in High-Performance Weightlifters-A Pilot Study.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Definite Implant Position as Novel Readout for Effectiveness of Ridge Preservation Indicates to Beneficial Effect of Combined Treatment with Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) and Xenogenic Biomaterial in Bone Regeneration.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Trueness and Precision of Intraoral Scanners for 3D-Printed Orthodontic Models with Attachments: An In Vitro Comparative Study.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

3D bioprinting advances bone tissue engineering by creating personalized structures. Nanotechnology integration enhances cell growth environments, bridging the gap between engineered and natural bone tissues.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Regenerative Medicine
  • Nanotechnology

Background:

  • 3D bioprinting has significantly advanced bone tissue engineering, enabling personalized macroscopic structure creation.
  • Recent progress includes microstructure bionics and improved cell-compatible microenvironments using nanotechnology and drug delivery.
  • The goal is to bridge the gap between engineered constructs and natural bone tissues.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current 3D bioprinting methods and bioink preparation for bone tissue engineering.
  • To classify scaffold materials and nanomaterials used in bone tissue engineering.
  • To discuss limitations and improvements in nanotechnology-based 3D bioprinting for bone regeneration.

Main Methods:

  • Review of established 3D bioprinting techniques.
Keywords:
3D printingbone defectnanotissue engineering

More Related Videos

Electrospun Nanofiber Scaffolds with Gradations in Fiber Organization
09:32

Electrospun Nanofiber Scaffolds with Gradations in Fiber Organization

Published on: April 19, 2015

Core/shell Printing Scaffolds For Tissue Engineering Of Tubular Structures
05:52

Core/shell Printing Scaffolds For Tissue Engineering Of Tubular Structures

Published on: September 27, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 28, 2026

Ceramic Omnidirectional Bioprinting in Cell-Laden Suspensions for the Generation of Bone Analogs
10:19

Ceramic Omnidirectional Bioprinting in Cell-Laden Suspensions for the Generation of Bone Analogs

Published on: August 8, 2022

Electrospun Nanofiber Scaffolds with Gradations in Fiber Organization
09:32

Electrospun Nanofiber Scaffolds with Gradations in Fiber Organization

Published on: April 19, 2015

Core/shell Printing Scaffolds For Tissue Engineering Of Tubular Structures
05:52

Core/shell Printing Scaffolds For Tissue Engineering Of Tubular Structures

Published on: September 27, 2019

  • Analysis of bioink formulations and material classifications.
  • Examination of nanomaterial integration and drug delivery systems.
  • Discussion of nanotechnology-based 3D bioprinting challenges and solutions.

    • Main Results:

    • Identification of widely used 3D bioprinting methods and bioink preparation strategies.
    • Classification of bone tissue engineering scaffolds and relevant nanomaterials.
    • Description of current technical limitations in nano-3D bioprinting for bone regeneration.
    • Outline of potential improvements and future directions for nanotechnology integration.

    Conclusions:

    • 3D bioprinting, enhanced by nanotechnology, shows significant promise for bone tissue engineering.
    • Continued research into bioinks, scaffolds, and nano-integration is crucial for clinical translation.
    • Nano-based 3D bioprinting offers a pathway to creating functional bone tissue replacements.