Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Echocardiographic Evaluation of Atrial Communications before Transcatheter Closure
Published on: February 8, 2022
Embolic Burden and Echocardiographic Predictors in a Real-World Cohort of Infective Endocarditis: A 15-Year
Călin Pop1,2, Lucian Liviu Pop2, Maria Rebeca Petruș1
1Department of Cardiology, "Constantin Opriş" Emergency County Hospital, Str. George Cosbuc Nr. 31, CP 430130 Baia Mare, Romania.
Abstract:
Background/Objectives: Systemic embolization is a common and serious complication of infective endocarditis (IE). This study evaluated the association between vegetation morphology and embolic events and assessed whether echocardiographic parameters provide incremental discriminatory value beyond clinical variables. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including 164 consecutive adults hospitalized with definite IE between 2011 and 2025 at a regional referral center. Vegetation presence, size, and mobility were assessed using transthoracic (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), according to clinical indication. The primary endpoint was overall in-hospital embolic burden, including embolic events present at admission, occurring during hospitalization, or incidentally detected during diagnostic work-up. Associations were analyzed using univariate and multivariable logistic regression, and model discrimination was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: Embolic events occurred in 96 patients (58.5%). Vegetations were identified in 68.3% of patients and were more frequent among those with embolization (78.1% vs. 54.4%). Mobile vegetations were more common in patients with embolic events (77.1% vs. 27.9%, p < 0.001), as were vegetations > 10 mm (61.5% vs. 38.2%, p = 0.006). Compared with non-mobile vegetations ≤ 10 mm, mobile vegetations ≤ 10 mm were associated with higher odds of embolization (OR 5.4), and mobile vegetations > 10 mm showed a similar association (OR 7.14). In multivariable analysis, vegetation mobility remained independently associated with embolic events. The clinical model demonstrated moderate discrimination (area under the curve [AUC] 0.71), which improved with the addition of vegetation mobility (AUC 0.81; p = 0.005) and size > 10 mm (AUC 0.79; p = 0.016), with no significant difference between the enhanced models. Conclusions: Both vegetation mobility and size > 10 mm were associated with overall in-hospital embolic burden and may provide complementary information for embolic risk stratification. These findings should be considered exploratory and require confirmation in prospective studies with standardized imaging and validation procedures.
Related Concept Videos
Endocarditis II: Clinical Features of Infective Endocarditis
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Endocarditis I: Introduction
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care