Classical Phytohormones and Peptide Plant Hormones in Abiotic Stress Tolerance: Crosstalk, Physiological Integration,...

Plants are constantly exposed to a wide range of abiotic stresses that have significant negative impacts on growth and yield. Plant acclimation to these stresses is governed by integrated classical phytohormone and plant peptide hormone signalling networks that control the ability of a plant to survive and adapt to extreme environments. Classical phytohormones, including abscisic acid, auxins, gibberellins, cytokinins, jasmonates, salicylic acid, brassinosteroids, and the recently recognised phytomelatonin, act in concert with peptide-based plant hormones, among which C-terminally encoded peptides (CEPs) play prominent roles in coordinating stress perception, signal transduction, and adaptive responses throughout the plant. These integrated networks control stomatal behaviour, photosynthesis, osmolyte and antioxidant levels, root architecture, and energy metabolism, thereby helping plants maintain homeostasis and optimise survival while sustaining minimal growth under unfavourable conditions. Under stressful conditions, these networks do not operate in isolation but form highly dynamic, context-dependent regulatory circuits in which each physiological process is simultaneously regulated by multiple hormones acting through convergent and overlapping signalling pathways. Phytomelatonin has emerged as a particularly important integrative node within these networks, functioning both as a potent direct antioxidant through sequential ROS-scavenging catabolite cascades and as a bidirectional regulator of classical phytohormone signalling under diverse abiotic stresses. New technologies in the fields of transcriptomics, proteomics, phosphoproteomics, metabolomics, and systems biology have provided new information on the dynamic relationships between classical phytohormones and plant peptide hormones, revealing candidate regulatory nodes and transcription factor networks that mediate stress adaptation at molecular, biochemical, and physiological levels. However, it is important to distinguish between correlative associations identified through omics profiling and causal regulatory relationships validated through rigorous genetic and biochemical experimentation, as most omics-derived candidates remain to be functionally established. Empirical studies demonstrate how these networks can be used to improve crops by increasing stress tolerance through modulating classical phytohormone and plant peptide hormone signalling, including through exogenous phytomelatonin application, CRISPR-mediated hormone pathway editing, and CEP pathway manipulation, to produce resilient cultivars without reducing yields. Although these advances represent significant progress, challenges remain, including the inherent complexity and redundancy of the networks, context-dependence and severity-dependence of hormonal responses, the persistence of a significant translational gap between laboratory findings and field application, and incomplete mechanistic understanding of peptide hormone roles under combined stress conditions. Addressing these challenges will require integrative multi-omics approaches, higher-order computational modelling, and rigorous field-based functional validation alongside emerging tools such as synthetic biology and precision breeding.