Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Voluntary Breath-hold Technique for Reducing Heart Dose in Left Breast Radiotherapy
Published on: July 3, 2014
Optimizing Cardiac Dose Prediction in Left-Sided Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy: Clinical Strategies for Identifying
Si-Ye Chen1, Yunxiang Wang1, Yu Tang1,2
1Departments of Radiation Oncology.
Purpose:
Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) is widely used in breast cancer radiation therapy to reduce cardiac radiation exposure. However, not all patients benefit from it. This study evaluated the performance of a convolutional neural network (CNN) model to predict cardiac doses under free-breathing (FB) and DIBH conditions for left-sided breast cancer radiation therapy, aiming to identify patients most likely to benefit from DIBH based on cardiac dosimetry.
Methods And Materials:
A total of 265 left-sided breast cancer patients undergoing whole-breast irradiation were included, with 200 retrospectively assigned to the training set and 65 prospectively assigned to the test set. The CNN model incorporated anatomic data, including organ structures and distance-to-target volume maps, to predict 3-dimensional dose distributions. Predicted dosimetric parameters were compared with clinical data to assess accuracy, and agreement between model-based and clinical classifications of DIBH benefit was evaluated using kappa statistics.
Results:
The CNN model demonstrated high accuracy in predicting cardiac dosimetric parameters, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.84 to 0.99 for mean dose (Dmean) and D2% in the heart, left anterior descending coronary artery, and ventricles under both FB and DIBH conditions. The model also accurately predicted dose-volume histograms for these structures, with no significant differences between clinical and predicted values. Using a classification approach based on heart Dmean in FB and its reduction via DIBH, the model correctly identified 90.8% of patients as DIBH beneficiaries (kappa value, 0.876). When applying a threshold of ΔHeart Dmean ≥1 Gy, the model identified significant DIBH benefits in 63.1% of patients, with 96.9% agreement between predicted and clinical classifications.
Conclusions:
The CNN-based model provides an efficient and accurate framework for predicting cardiac dose and identifying patients most likely to benefit from DIBH. Future studies should explore its applicability across broader radiation therapy scenarios and evaluate its long-term impact on cardiac outcomes.

