Effects of Resistance Respiratory Training on Respiratory Muscle Strength in Healthy Active Individuals

Respiratory muscle strength (RMS) is a critical factor influencing athletic performance, particularly in high-intensity or prolonged activities. RMS encompasses inspiratory (IMs) and expiratory muscles (EMs), which differ in anatomical structure, fiber composition, and responsiveness to training.

This pilot interventional within-subject study investigated the effects of two resistive respiratory muscle training (RMT) protocols on RMS and small airway function in eight physically active adults (two females, six males). Maximal inspiratory (MIP) and expiratory pressures (MEP), along with pulmonary function tests (PFTs), were measured using the Airofit PRO™ device and spirometry before and after two consecutive 7-day training protocols, with a 2-day break between interventions. The workload was progressively increased by lengthening the duration of forced inhalation and exhalation, while keeping the air resistance constant.

Results demonstrated significant improvements in MEP across both protocols and after a 10-day washout period (p < 0.001-0.03), whereas MIP showed no significant changes (p = 0.19-0.66). Moderate transient improvements were observed in small airway flow (MEF25%) following the first protocol (ES = 0.62), which regressed after the second.

These outcomes suggest differential responsiveness of respiratory muscles to RMT; EMs, characterized by a higher proportion of fast-twitch type II fibers and a predominantly passive role in normal breathing, respond rapidly to short-duration, high-intensity forced expiration training through neuromuscular adaptations. Conversely, IMs, dominated by slow-twitch type I fibers, require longer-duration, higher-load training to elicit meaningful adaptations, explaining the limited changes in MIP. Small airway function appeared minimally trainable due to structural and physiological constraints, with short-term improvements likely reflecting effort-dependent factors rather than lasting adaptations. Finally, RMT can selectively enhance EM performance through appropriately designed short-duration, high-intensity interventions, while IMs may necessitate prolonged or higher-load stimuli. The findings highlight the importance of targeted training strategies, individualized to muscle fiber composition and functional demands, to optimize respiratory performance. Future research should investigate longer interventions, larger diverse cohorts, and precise measurement methods to further elucidate RMT's effects on both respiratory muscles and small airway function.