Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

Effects of Surgical Masks on Cardiopulmonary Function in Healthy Subjects
Published on: February 12, 2021
Effect of Compression Surfaces on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality and Clinician Fatigue
Stephen Powell1, Ashley Lutrick2, Shriman Balasubramanian1
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Objectives:
Current American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines recommend moving patients to a hard surface, when possible, to improve cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality. However, the time to move a patient detracts from the time actively performing CPR. Studies show mixed results on the effect of a soft surface on CPR quality. The primary objective of this study was to compare the fatiguability of performing CPR on the floor versus a standard mattress.
Methods:
This pilot randomized trial enrolled currently employed emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians from two EMS agencies in North Carolina from 10/2022 to 12/2022. Participants performed continuous compressions on a CPR manikin with integrated electronic feedback, randomized 1:1 to a floor or a mattress. The primary outcome was time to failure, defined as voluntary cessation of compressions by the participant or 30 s of inadequate compressions. Adequate compressions were defined using the current AHA recommendations for high-quality CPR, including a compression rate of 100-120/min and depth of at least 2 in. We describe time to failure and compression rate with median and interquartile range (IQR), and compare them between surfaces with the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test. We constructed a survival curve of the time to failure by surface and compared them with a log-rank test.
Results:
Among 40 participants, 47.5% (19/40) were female and 90.0% (36/40) were White with an average age of 28 (IQR 24-33) years. The time to failure for floor CPR was 145 s (IQR 65-240) vs. 140 s (IQR 100-420) for mattress CPR (p = 0.64). Floor participants performed compressions at a median rate of 112 (IQR 104-118) compressions per minute vs. 105 (IQR 101-113) compressions per minute for mattress participants (p = 0.12). Using a survival analysis, the time to failure was not statistically different between surfaces (p = 0.4).
Conclusions:
This prospective pilot study suggests no difference in fatigability of a person performing CPR on a mattress versus a floor. Further study is necessary to validate our findings.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation V: Advanced Airway Management Techniques
Acute Respiratory Failure-IV
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use

