Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

A Recovery Cardiopulmonary Bypass Model Without Transfusion or Inotropic Agents in Rats
Published on: March 23, 2018
Fibrinogen/Albumin Ratio and Outcome in Adult Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Stefano Casalino1, Martina Anguissola, Alessandro Barbaria
1From the Department of Cardiovascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.
Background:
Fibrinogen/albumin ratio (F/A ratio) has been proposed as a prognostic factor for different outcomes in different clinical settings, including cardiovascular interventions. However, few studies address the F/A ratio as a possible predictor of postoperative outcome in adult cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The hypothesis of the present study is that by including the F/A ratio in the existing risk models for major morbidity after adult cardiac surgery may result in better discrimination, calibration, and risk reclassification of the model.
Methods:
This is a retrospective study including 836 adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery with CPB. Every patient received an F/A ratio calculation, and other preoperative factors were collected (demographics, comorbidities, operation details, and EuroSCORE II). The primary outcome measure was major morbidity, defined as 1 or more of the following: surgical revision for any cardiac reason; stroke; acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy; deep sternal wound infection; prolonged mechanical ventilation. The F/A ratio alone and EuroSCORE II-based predictive models with or without the F/A ratio were tested for major morbidity predictive properties.
Results:
F/A ratio was univariately associated with major morbidity (odds ratio 1.025, 95% confidence interval 1.061-1.091, P = .004), but carried a poor discrimination for major morbidity with an area under the curve (AUC) for receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis of 0.606. A multivariable risk model based on the EuroSCORE II yielded a significantly ( P < .001) better AUC (0.731); the inclusion of F/A ratio within this model did not significantly improve this value, which remained at 0.730. The models with or without F/A ratio had similar calibration for major morbidity prediction, and the model inclusive of F/A ratio did not significantly change the risk classification of the patients.
Conclusions:
The F/A ratio alone has poor predictive properties for major morbidity, and there is no added value in including the F/A ratio into the existing risk models. In the setting of adult cardiac surgery with CPB, we did not confirm the usefulness of the F/A ratio described in other settings, such as cardiac surgery without CPB. This may be due to both the consumption and sequestration of these proteins during CPB.

