Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
Safety of Telemedicine Follow-Up Visits in Children With Cancer Undergoing Intensive Chemotherapy: Results From the
Denis M Schewe1, Annika Rademacher2, Patricia Kattner2
1Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University Hospital Dresden, Technical University Dresden, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Insights
Telemedicine follow-up visits are safe for children undergoing intensive chemotherapy, reducing travel burdens without increasing adverse events. This approach offers a feasible alternative to in-person care for pediatric oncology patients.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Oncology
- Digital Health
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Centralization of pediatric oncology care necessitates expanded telemedicine services.
- Safety data for telemedicine in highly vulnerable pediatric patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy is limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and feasibility of telemedicine follow-up visits (TV) compared to in-person outpatient visits (IPV) for pediatric oncology patients receiving intensive chemotherapy.
Main Methods:
- A phase III randomized crossover trial (KULT-SH) involving 55 patients (age 1-25) at two German university hospitals.
- Patients alternated between 3 months of TV (video visits, electronic vital signs) and 3 months of IPV.
- Primary endpoint: cumulative severe adverse events (CTCAE grade ≥3).
Main Results:
- 18% of outpatient visits were conducted via telemedicine, avoiding 337 hospital visits and 42,288 km of travel.
- Cumulative severe adverse event rates were similar between TV (4.09 ± 4.26) and IPV (4.00 ± 3.95; P = .949).
- Most frequent severe events included febrile neutropenia and gastrointestinal issues; no deaths occurred.
Conclusions:
- Telemedicine follow-up visits are a feasible and safe alternative to in-person care for pediatric oncology patients during intensive chemotherapy.
- This modality significantly reduces patient travel burden without compromising safety or increasing adverse events.
Purpose:
Centralization of pediatric oncology care has increased the need for telemedicine. Evidence on its safety in highly vulnerable patients such as children undergoing intensive chemotherapy remains limited.
Methods:
KULT-SH was a phase III randomized crossover trial at two university hospitals in Northern Germany. Patients age 1-25 years with malignant diseases received either telemedicine follow-up visits (TV) or in-person outpatient follow-up visits (IPV) for 3 months, followed by crossover to the alternate mode. TV included video visits and electronic transmission of vital signs. The primary end point, evaluated in the intention-to-treat population, was the cumulative number of severe adverse events (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥3). For analysis, data from both crossover sequences were combined for the TV and IPV phases.
Results:
Between June 2021 and May 2024, 55 patients (mean age 8.7 ± 6.0 years; 58% male) were randomly assigned. Overall, 18% of outpatient visits were delivered via telemedicine. 337 hospital visits were avoided, corresponding to 42,288 km of travel. Mean cumulative Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events scores were similar between phases (TV 4.09 ± 4.26 v IPV 4.00 ± 3.95; mean difference -0.05, 95% CI, -1.51 to 1.41; P = .949), indicating comparable rates of adverse events between TV and IPV. The most frequent grade 3-4 events were febrile neutropenia and gastrointestinal complications; no deaths occurred. Symptom-to-antibiotic time did not differ significantly between groups.
Conclusion:
Telemedicine follow-up visits represent a feasible alternative to in-person outpatient care during intensive chemotherapy, reducing travel burden without evidence of increased adverse events.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Treatment Resistent Cancers
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
