Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

06:28
E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Randomised Controlled Feasibility Trial of Face-To-Face Diabetes Self-Management Education Shows High Completion
Gemma A Lewis1,2, David M Hughes3, Greg J Irving4
1Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
|May 27, 2026
Summary
Full completion of diabetes self-management education (DSME) is crucial for meaningful psychological benefits. Partial attendance, even at 60%, does not significantly improve diabetes distress or quality of life.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology and Metabolism
- Behavioral Medicine
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Diabetes self-management education (DSME) is vital for managing type 2 diabetes.
- Current DSME programs often use partial attendance benchmarks, questioning their efficacy.
- This study investigates the dose-response relationship between DSME attendance and psychological outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the dose-response relationship between diabetes self-management education (DSME) attendance and psychological outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes.
- To assess if minimal (10%) or partial (60%) DSME attendance yields clinically meaningful improvements.
- To compare outcomes with full (100%) DSME completion.
Main Methods:
- A randomized feasibility trial involving 120 adults with type 2 diabetes.
- Participants were assigned to 100%, 60%, 10%, or 0% (delayed) DSME attendance.
- Primary outcomes included self-management skills; secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and diabetes distress.
Main Results:
- Significant differences in self-management skills and diabetes distress were found across attendance groups (p < 0.001).
- A dose-response relationship was evident, with education dose explaining 16%-17% of the variance.
- Clinically meaningful improvements in psychological domains were observed only with 100% DSME completion; no significant HRQoL differences were noted between groups.
Conclusions:
- Clinically significant psychological benefits from DSME necessitate full (100%) program completion.
- Attendance thresholds of 10% or partial completion (60%) did not result in meaningful improvements in diabetes distress or HRQoL.
- Findings support 100% DSME attendance as the gold standard, questioning the utility of current partial attendance performance indicators.