Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Using Supported Decision-Making to Promote Value-Aligned Research Participation
Shen Pan1, Robert D Dinerstein2, David Wendler1
1Department of Bioethics, https://ror.org/01cwqze88National Institutes of Health, United States.
Supported decision-making helps individuals with intellectual or cognitive disabilities make authentic choices in clinical research. Integrating dialectical support ensures decisions align with personal values, enhancing self-determination and research participation.
Area of Science:
- Bioethics
- Disability Studies
- Clinical Research Ethics
Background:
- Individuals with intellectual or cognitive disabilities often require support for decision-making.
- Ensuring value-aligned choices in clinical research participation is crucial for autonomy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore supported decision-making (SDM) for value-aligned choices in clinical research for individuals with intellectual or cognitive disabilities.
- To identify challenges in SDM for this population and propose solutions.
Main Methods:
- Conceptual analysis of SDM principles.
- Identification of specific challenges: integrating competing values and unpacking underspecified values.
- Proposal of integrating dialectical support into SDM.
Main Results:
- SDM enhances self-determination and increases the likelihood of value-aligned decisions.
- Challenges arise when individuals must integrate multiple values or unpack vague ones.
- Dialectical support offers a structured dialogue to explore and apply values.
Conclusions:
- Supported decision-making, enhanced by dialectical support, can improve authentic decision-making for individuals with intellectual or cognitive disabilities in clinical research.
- Addressing value-related challenges is key to promoting ethical and self-determined research participation.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Ethical Dilemmas II
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
