Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
Clinical Efficacy and Security Analysis of CDK4/6 Inhibitors Combined with ET in Patients with HR+HER2- Advanced
Yan Wang1, Dongmei Chen2, Zhenning Wang3
1Department of Medical Oncology III, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 750004, People's Republic of China.
Objective:
To evaluate the clinical efficacy and security of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy (ET) in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR⁺), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer.
Methods:
We selected 145 patients with HR+HER2- advanced breast cancer from the hospital's electronic medical record system and divided them into an observation group of 83 cases (CDK4/6i combined with ET treatment) and a comparison group of 62 cases (ET treatment) according to the treatment plan. Analyze and compare the efficacy and security of patients receiving different treatment regimens.
Results:
The ORR was significantly higher in the observation group (CDK4/6i + ET) compared to the comparison group (ET alone) (45.8% vs. 22.6%, p=0.005). The DCR was also superior in the observation group (84.3% vs. 67.7%, p=0.018). The median PFS was 15.0 months (95% CI: 12.5-17.5) in the observation group versus 9.0 months (95% CI: 7.5-10.5) in the comparison group (p<0.001). The median OS was 20.5 months (95% CI: 18.0-23.0) and 9.5 months (95% CI: 8.0-11.0), respectively (p=0.002). COX multivariate analysis identified ER level as an independent protective factor (HR=0.559, 95% CI: 0.352-0.888, p<0.05), while liver metastasis was an independent risk factor for PFS.
Conclusion:
CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with ET demonstrates favorable clinical efficacy in patients with HR⁺HER2- advanced breast cancer, with manageable adverse reactions and a good security profile. The ER level may be an independent protective factor affecting the PFS of the overall population, while liver metastasis may be an independent risk factor affecting the PFS of patients.
More Related Videos
15:04Potentiation of Anticancer Antibody Efficacy by Antineoplastic Drugs: Detection of Antibody-drug Synergism Using the Combination Index Equation
Published on: January 19, 2019
08:57Sample Extraction and Simultaneous Chromatographic Quantitation of Doxorubicin and Mitomycin C Following Drug Combination Delivery in Nanoparticles to Tumor-bearing Mice
Published on: October 5, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Inhibition of Cdk Activity
Inhibition of CDK Activity
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
M-Cdk Drives Transition Into Mitosis
Cyclin-dependent kinases, or Cdks, work in concert with cyclins to control cell cycle transitions. M-Cdk, a complex of Cdk1 bound to M cyclin, is a well-known example of this coordinated control that drives the transition from the G2 to the M phase.
M cyclin...
Mitogens and the Cell Cycle