Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

Ultrasound-guided Botulinum Toxin-A Injections: A Method of Treating Sialorrhea
Published on: November 9, 2016
Botulinum toxin type A for subacute/chronic neck pain.
Anita R Gross1, Haejung Lee2, Nejin Chacko1
1School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) injections may offer slight short-term pain relief for neck pain but lack long-term benefits for function. Non-serious side effects are more frequent, and more research is needed.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Pain Management
- Musculoskeletal Disorders
Background:
- Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) injections are a common treatment for neck pain unresponsive to other therapies.
- The benefit-harm profile of BoNT-A for neck pain remains uncertain, necessitating a comprehensive review of current evidence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the benefits and harms of intramuscular BoNT-A injections for individuals with subacute to chronic neck pain.
- To synthesize evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating BoNT-A for neck pain.
Main Methods:
- A systematic search of multiple databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL) and trial registers was conducted up to March 2026.
- Included were RCTs comparing BoNT-A to placebo or no treatment in adults with subacute to chronic neck disorder.
- Outcomes included pain, function-disability, quality of life, treatment success, and adverse events. Risk of bias was assessed using ROB 2, and certainty of evidence with GRADE.
Main Results:
- BoNT-A may provide slight-to-small short-term pain relief (6% absolute improvement) and perceived treatment success (20% absolute improvement).
- No significant long-term benefits were observed for physical function or health-related quality of life.
- A moderate risk reduction in pain events (23% absolute) may be overestimated due to publication bias. Non-serious adverse events, such as injection soreness, were 16% more frequent.
Conclusions:
- BoNT-A offers limited short-term benefits for neck pain, with no demonstrated long-term advantages in function or quality of life.
- The evidence is limited by high risk of bias, imprecision, and potential publication bias, indicating a need for larger, high-quality studies.
- While non-serious adverse events are more common, the overall benefit-harm profile remains uncertain, warranting cautious consideration of BoNT-A for neck pain management.
Related Concept Videos
Directly Acting Muscle Relaxants: Dantrolene and Botulinum Toxin
The binding of dantrolene to the RYR1...
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses
Botulism
Classification of Skeletal Muscle Relaxants
Peripherally acting skeletal muscle relaxants interfere with the neurotransmission at the neuromuscular end plate to induce paralysis during...
Peripherally and Centrally Acting Muscle Relaxants: A Comparison
Centrally acting muscle relaxants can be further divided into spasmolytic and antispasmodic drugs. Spasmolytic drugs,...
Tetanus
