Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

Reverse Dissection and DiceCT Reveal Otherwise Hidden Data in the Evolution of the Primate Face
Published on: January 7, 2019
Sexual Dimorphism in Facial and Body Shape and Their Relationship in Modern Humans of African, Asian, and European
Marina L Butovskaya1, Victoria V Rostovtseva1, Daria A Dronova1
1Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Objectives:
Our study aimed to quantify the degrees of sexual dimorphism in facial shape and nineteen body parameters across eleven living populations from three major world regions: Sub-Saharan Africa (five populations), Europe (three populations), and Asia (three populations).
Methods:
The data were collected in Tanzania and Russian Federation (N = 2214 individuals, aged 16-35 years), utilizing identical methods. Facial shape was explored through geometric morphometrics based on photographs. Body parameters were obtained through direct measurements.
Results:
We found that body parameters are highly sexually dimorphic in humans and have population specificity: in taller and more robust populations (Europeans, Asians), body height, bone mass, handgrip strength, and wrist diameter are the most dimorphic traits, whereas Africans demonstrate the highest variability in body dimorphism. In contrast, the degree of facial sexual dimorphism increases from minimum in Africans to intermediate in Asians and maximum in European populations. Sexually dimorphic facial shape patterns vary by population origin, with allometry on average explaining over half of the sex differences. We did not find a linear relationship between overall degrees of body and facial dimorphism across study populations. However, dimorphism in several isolated body parameters correlated with facial dimorphism at the population level. Particularly, for body height, handgrip strength, and bone mass, such correlations remained evident even after correction for population phylogenetic relatedness.
Conclusions:
Differences in degrees of sexual dimorphism in study populations cannot be explained by allometry alone, but rather they result from a complex interplay of various factors and pressures, including phylogenetic origin, environmental conditions, and cultural norms.
More Related Videos
06:00Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila
Published on: October 1, 2011
08:03Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
Published on: November 4, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Relationship Formation
Facial Feedback Hypothesis
Natural Selection and Mating Preferences
Females, due to their biological roles in conception, pregnancy, and nursing, inherently...
Mate Choice
Synteny and Evolution
Around 80 million years ago, the human and mice lineages diverged from the common ancestor. During the course of evolution, the ancestral chromosome underwent...
The Y Chromosome Determines Maleness
Evolution
Around 300 million years ago, the two sex chromosomes diverged from two identical autosomal chromosomes. Over time, the Y chromosome has lost most of its genes, shrinking in size. Today,...