Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
The...
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor 't,' or...
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A confidence...
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance, comparing...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Laccase is necessary and nonredundant with peroxidase for lignin polymerization during vascular development in Arabidopsis.

The Plant cell·2013
Same author

An investigation of pupil-based cognitive load measurement with low cost infrared webcam under light reflex interference.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2013
Same author

The specific α-neurexin interactor calsyntenin-3 promotes excitatory and inhibitory synapse development.

Neuron·2013
Same author

Soil nutrient assessment for urban ecosystems in Hubei, China.

PloS one·2013
Same author

Quorum quenching enzymes and their application in degrading signal molecules to block quorum sensing-dependent infection.

International journal of molecular sciences·2013
Same author

Electrosprayed microparticles with loaded pDNA-calcium phosphate nanoparticles to promote the regeneration of mature blood vessels.

Pharmaceutical research·2013
Same journal

Correction.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Leveraging external controls in clinical trials: estimands, estimation, assumptions.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Special issue of nonclinical statistics in regulatory applications guest editors' notes.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Comparison of flexible parametric modeling and nonparametric methods to estimate restricted mean survival time: A simulation study.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Simulated treatment comparisons with jackknife pseudo values for estimating population-adjusted marginal treatment effects.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Sample sizes for randomized controlled trials utilizing Bayesian response adaptive randomization for continuous outcomes.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 29, 2026

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)

Published on: June 3, 2009

Tolerance and prediction intervals: The Bayesian way.

José G Ramírez1, Fang Chen2

  • 1Kite Pharma, A Gilead Company, Santa Monica, CA, USA.

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
|May 28, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Bayesian methods offer a robust solution for establishing acceptance criteria when pharmaceutical quality attribute data is non-normally distributed. These methods provide accurate tolerance and prediction bounds for complex data, unlike traditional frequentist approaches.

Keywords:
Bayesian tolerance intervalscensoringnonnormal distributionsprior knowledgetolerance intervalstolerance limitsβ-contentβ-expectation

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 29, 2026

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)

Published on: June 3, 2009

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Pharmaceutical Science
  • Biotechnology
  • Statistics

Background:

  • Regulatory guidelines (FDA Q6B, ICH Q6A) mandate data-driven acceptance criteria for drug products.
  • Traditional methods for setting acceptance criteria rely on normal distribution assumptions, which are often violated by pharmaceutical quality attribute data.
  • Non-normal data distributions (e.g., skewed, heavy-tailed) can lead to unreliable or infeasible results with standard frequentist interval calculations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the limitations of traditional methods for setting acceptance criteria with non-normal data.
  • To introduce and demonstrate the application of Bayesian methods for calculating tolerance and prediction bounds.
  • To provide a principled statistical framework for handling complex data distributions in pharmaceutical quality control.

Main Methods:

  • Review of key Bayesian statistical concepts relevant to acceptance criteria.
  • Development and presentation of algorithms for calculating one-sided and two-sided Bayesian tolerance and prediction bounds.
  • Application of Bayesian methods to worked examples with non-normal data.

Main Results:

  • Bayesian methods accommodate diverse probability models, including those with skewness, heavy tails, or censored data.
  • Prior information can be naturally incorporated in Bayesian frameworks, enhancing estimation precision, particularly with small sample sizes.
  • Demonstrated flexibility and ease of use of Bayesian approaches for estimating tolerance and prediction limits in complex scenarios.

Conclusions:

  • Bayesian methods provide a superior alternative to traditional frequentist approaches for setting acceptance criteria with non-normal pharmaceutical quality attribute data.
  • The presented Bayesian algorithms offer a practical and reliable solution for establishing robust acceptance criteria.
  • These methods enhance the accuracy and feasibility of setting specifications in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries.