Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

An Alternative to the Traditional Cold Pressor Test: The Cold Pressor Arm Wrap
Published on: January 16, 2014
Reducing Physical Restraint in the ICU: Multicenter Phase II Randomized Trial of a Novel Device Versus Traditional
Renee D Stapleton1, Biren B Kamdar2, Elizabeth A Colantuoni3
1Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT.
Objectives:
To evaluate a novel device, developed under a National Institutes of Health Small Business Technology Transfer program grant, designed as an alternative to traditional wrist restraints.
Design:
Within-patient crossover phase II randomized trial.
Setting:
Four U.S. academic medical centers.
Patients:
ICU patients ( n = 54) who were verbally responsive with a provider order for wrist restraints and expected stay greater than or equal to 2 days.
Interventions:
Alternating use of novel device vs. traditional restraint during 4-hour assessment periods over 2 days (four assessment periods), with randomization of initial allocation to novel device vs. restraint.
Measurements And Main Results:
Upper extremity activity (measured via wrist actigraphy) was the primary outcome, with safety, sedation, delirium, satisfaction (via Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology [QUEST] survey), and qualitative analyses of survey data as secondary outcomes. Analysis of actigraphy data demonstrated similar mean activity counts per 4-hour session for the novel device vs. traditional restraints, with a range of mean activity across the four sessions of 2930-4395 vs. 3898-4910, respectively, with relative mean total activity count per session of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.76-1.13; p = 0.45). Across 98 sessions using the novel device, 2 (2%) potential safety events were reported. No statistically significant differences were observed in sedation/agitation, or delirium status and severity. Of the QUEST satisfaction surveys completed by patient/family ( n = 25) and clinicians ( n = 79), 58% and 51%, respectively, indicated high satisfaction with qualitative analyses demonstrating four positive and six constructive themes.
Conclusions:
No differences in upper extremity activity, delirium, sedation, or agitation were demonstrated between the novel device and traditional wrist restraints. The novel device had overall moderate patient/family and clinician satisfaction, and qualitative analyses provide important insights for advancing the development of novel restraint alternative devices.
More Related Videos
04:38Application of Bedside Lower Extremity Rehabilitation Robots in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Published on: November 28, 2025
08:40Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
Published on: June 12, 2019