Endovascular Therapy for Isolated M2 Occlusion in Patients with Ischemic Stroke: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Noriyuki Sahara1,2, Go Hashimoto1,2, Kuniyuki Nakamura1

  • 1Department of Medicine and Clinical Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

Abstract

Insights

Endovascular therapy (EVT) did not show better outcomes than best medical management (BMM) for acute isolated M2 occlusion stroke patients. Further trials are needed to clarify EVT

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Interventional Neuroradiology
  • Stroke Medicine

Background:

  • Endovascular therapy (EVT) is established for large vessel occlusion strokes.
  • Efficacy of EVT for medium vessel occlusions, specifically isolated M2 segments, is uncertain.
  • M2 occlusions can cause significant neurological deficits, necessitating clarity on EVT's role.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy and safety of EVT versus best medical management (BMM) for acute isolated M2 occlusion.
  • To compare functional outcomes and mortality between EVT and BMM groups.
  • To analyze secondary outcomes including neurological changes and hemorrhagic complications.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of a multicentre stroke registry including patients with isolated M2 occlusion within 24 hours of onset.
  • Propensity score matching created 100 well-balanced pairs of EVT- and BMM-treated patients.
  • Primary outcomes: favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-2 or 0-1) and mortality at 3 months.

Main Results:

  • No significant difference in favorable functional outcomes (mRS 0-2: 49% EVT vs. 46% BMM) or mortality (7% vs. 9%) at 3 months.
  • EVT group had higher rates of any intracranial hemorrhage (46% vs. 21%), but symptomatic rates were similar (5%).
  • Exploratory analyses suggested potential treatment effect heterogeneity based on onset-to-door time.

Conclusions:

  • EVT was not superior to BMM in functional outcomes or mortality for acute isolated M2 occlusion.
  • Findings suggest heterogeneity in M2 occlusions and potential influence of factors like time to treatment.
  • Adequately powered randomized trials are needed to guide individualized treatment decisions for M2 occlusions.