Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Endovascular Therapy for Isolated M2 Occlusion in Patients with Ischemic Stroke: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
Noriyuki Sahara1,2, Go Hashimoto1,2, Kuniyuki Nakamura1
1Department of Medicine and Clinical Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Introduction:
Endovascular therapy (EVT) is an established treatment for large vessel occlusion in patients with acute ischaemic stroke; however, its efficacy for medium vessel occlusions, particularly isolated M2 segment occlusions, remains uncertain. As M2 occlusions are relatively proximal among medium vessel occlusions and can cause disabling neurological deficits, clarifying the role of EVT is clinically important. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EVT compared with best medical management (BMM) in patients with acute isolated M2 occlusion using data from a multicentre registry.
Methods:
We analysed the data of patients from a multicentre stroke registry who had an isolated M2 occlusion, had arrived within 24 h of onset, and were functionally independent before stroke. Data on baseline demographics, vascular risk factors, stroke characteristics, and treatment were collected. Propensity score matching generated 100 well-balanced pairs of EVT- and BMM-treated patients. The primary outcomes were favourable functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score of 0-2 or 0-1) and mortality at discharge and 3 months. The secondary outcomes included neurological improvement or deterioration and haemorrhagic complications during hospitalisation.
Results:
Among 594 eligible patients (EVT, n = 118; BMM, n = 476), data from 100 matched pairs were analysed. At 3 months, good functional outcomes (mRS score of 0-2: 49% EVT vs. 46% BMM) and mortality (7% vs. 9%) were comparable, with consistent findings at discharge. EVT was associated with higher rates of any intracranial haemorrhage (46% vs. 21%), although the symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage rates were identical (5%). In exploratory subgroup analyses, a significant interaction with onset-to-door time was observed for mRS score of 0-2 (p = 0.03), whereas no significant interaction was detected for mRS score of 0-1 or mortality.
Conclusion:
In this multicentre registry of patients with isolated M2 occlusion, EVT was not associated with superior functional outcomes or reduced mortality, compared with BMM. Although exploratory analyses suggested possible heterogeneity of treatment effect according to clinical factors, such as time from onset, these findings should be interpreted cautiously. Overall, the results highlight the heterogeneity of M2 occlusions and underscore the need for adequately powered randomised trials to inform individualised treatment decisions.
Insights
Endovascular therapy (EVT) did not show better outcomes than best medical management (BMM) for acute isolated M2 occlusion stroke patients. Further trials are needed to clarify EVT
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Interventional Neuroradiology
- Stroke Medicine
Background:
- Endovascular therapy (EVT) is established for large vessel occlusion strokes.
- Efficacy of EVT for medium vessel occlusions, specifically isolated M2 segments, is uncertain.
- M2 occlusions can cause significant neurological deficits, necessitating clarity on EVT's role.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of EVT versus best medical management (BMM) for acute isolated M2 occlusion.
- To compare functional outcomes and mortality between EVT and BMM groups.
- To analyze secondary outcomes including neurological changes and hemorrhagic complications.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of a multicentre stroke registry including patients with isolated M2 occlusion within 24 hours of onset.
- Propensity score matching created 100 well-balanced pairs of EVT- and BMM-treated patients.
- Primary outcomes: favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-2 or 0-1) and mortality at 3 months.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in favorable functional outcomes (mRS 0-2: 49% EVT vs. 46% BMM) or mortality (7% vs. 9%) at 3 months.
- EVT group had higher rates of any intracranial hemorrhage (46% vs. 21%), but symptomatic rates were similar (5%).
- Exploratory analyses suggested potential treatment effect heterogeneity based on onset-to-door time.
Conclusions:
- EVT was not superior to BMM in functional outcomes or mortality for acute isolated M2 occlusion.
- Findings suggest heterogeneity in M2 occlusions and potential influence of factors like time to treatment.
- Adequately powered randomized trials are needed to guide individualized treatment decisions for M2 occlusions.
Related Concept Videos
Ischemic Stroke ll: Pathophysiology
Ischemic Stroke l: Introduction