Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026
Ex Vivo Porcine Experimental Model for Studying and Teaching Lung Mechanics
Published on: April 19, 2024
Technology-Enhanced Strategies to Optimize Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Patients Receiving Invasive Mechanical
Adam J Boulton1, Adel Elfeky2,3, Rachel Court2,3
1Warwick Clinical Trials Units, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Objectives:
To undertake a systematic review evaluating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of technology-enhanced positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) optimization strategies in adults and children receiving invasive mechanical ventilation on an ICU.
Data Sources:
We searched key electronic databases (including MEDLINE and Embase) from inception to July 2024.
Study Selection:
We included randomized studies examining clinical or cost-effectiveness of technology-enhanced PEEP optimization strategies compared with standard care or an alternative PEEP optimization strategy in adults and children. The primary outcome was duration of mechanical ventilation and secondary outcomes were clinical effectiveness (e.g., mortality) and efficacy (e.g., PEEP).
Data Extraction:
Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility, extracted data, assessed risk of bias (Revised Cochrane tool) and performed Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation evidence certainty assessments.
Data Synthesis:
Our database and trial register search retrieved 8845 results, of which 34 studies (2951 patients) were included. Eight studies were at low risk of bias. Across studies, 7 technologies were evaluated, most commonly esophageal balloon measurement of transpulmonary pressure (10 studies), electrical impedance tomography (7 studies), pressure-volume curve analysis (6 studies), and fully automated closed-loop ventilation (5 studies). Meta-analysis used random-effects models. Duration of mechanical ventilation was reported in only three studies (172 patients, two technologies) and there was no effect compared with standard care (mean difference -0.06 d; 95% CI, -0.20 to 0.09; very low-certainty evidence).For 28-day mortality (10 studies; 1,719 patients; six technologies), technology-enhanced PEEP optimization reduced 28-day mortality (risk ratio 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52-0.93; very low-certainty evidence). No significant differences were found for other clinical-effectiveness outcomes. We identified no evidence in children or on cost-effectiveness.
Conclusions:
Technology-enhanced PEEP optimization strategies did not reduce duration of mechanical ventilation, but these technologies may reduce mortality. Evidence certainty was low or very low, highlighting the urgent need for adequately powered randomized trials.
Registration:
PROSPERO (CRD42024555390).
Related Concept Videos
01:23Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV)
01:23Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
01:29Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
01:14Ventilatory Modes
There are three ventilatory modes: full support, partial support, and spontaneous. These are described below.
Full Support Modes
Full support modes include controlled mechanical ventilation, continuous mandatory...
01:22Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
01:30Pneumonia V: Nursing management and Prevention
The nurse must practice strict medical asepsis and adhere to infection control guidelines to minimize healthcare-associated infections.
Enhance airway patency
Position the patient correctly to facilitate drainage of the affected lung segments. Manual or mechanical percussion and vibration can also be employed.