Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

08:55
Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses
Published on: June 7, 2018
Cluster and network formation in Fe-Si-B amorphous alloys: a machine learning molecular dynamics study
Ryohei Ikebuchi1, M Shimono2, Motoki Ohta1
1Next Generation Tatara Co-Creation Centre, Shimane University, Shimane, Japan.
Summary
Local atomic arrangements in amorphous Fe-Si-B alloys reveal distinct roles for boron and silicon. Boron clusters mimic crystalline structures, supporting Gaskell
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Condensed Matter Physics
- Computational Materials Science
Background:
- Local atomic arrangements, including short- and medium-range order (SRO and MRO), dictate amorphous material properties.
- Gaskell's 1979 model proposed that structural motifs in transition metal-metalloid glasses mirror crystalline ordering.
- Amorphous Fe-Si-B alloys are crucial soft-magnetic materials for energy-efficient motors.
Purpose of the Study:
- Investigate SRO and MRO in amorphous Fe-Si-B alloys.
- Clarify the structural roles of minor elements Boron (B) and Silicon (Si).
- Validate Gaskell's structural model for amorphous alloys.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a previously developed machine-learning interatomic potential (Gaussian Approximation Potential framework).
- Performed melt-quench molecular dynamics simulations on 2,048-atom systems.
- Analyzed SRO and MRO to understand element-specific cluster geometries and connectivity.
Main Results:
- Boron-centered clusters predominantly form bi-capped anti-prism (BAP) and tri-capped trigonal prism (TTP) geometries, mirroring crystalline Fe₂B and Fe₃B.
- Silicon-centered clusters preferentially adopt icosahedral motifs, typical of amorphous structures.
- Boron clusters, especially BAP, exhibit a greater tendency for network formation at the MRO level compared to silicon clusters.
Conclusions:
- Simulation results strongly support Gaskell's model by demonstrating crystalline-like ordering in Boron clusters.
- Distinct structural preferences of Boron and Silicon contribute to the unique properties of amorphous Fe-Si-B alloys.
- Understanding SRO and MRO is key to designing advanced soft-magnetic materials.
Related Concept Videos
Network Covalent Solids
Network covalent solids contain a three-dimensional network of covalently bonded atoms as found in the crystal structures of nonmetals like diamond, graphite, silicon, and some covalent compounds, such as silicon dioxide (sand) and silicon carbide (carborundum, the abrasive on sandpaper). Many minerals have networks of covalent bonds.
To break or to melt a covalent network solid, covalent bonds must be broken. Because covalent bonds are relatively strong, covalent network solids are typically...
To break or to melt a covalent network solid, covalent bonds must be broken. Because covalent bonds are relatively strong, covalent network solids are typically...
Metallic Solids
Metallic solids such as crystals of copper, aluminum, and iron are formed by metal atoms. The structure of metallic crystals is often described as a uniform distribution of atomic nuclei within a “sea” of delocalized electrons. The atoms within such a metallic solid are held together by a unique force known as metallic bonding that gives rise to many useful and varied bulk properties.
All metallic solids exhibit high thermal and electrical conductivity, metallic luster, and malleability. Many...
All metallic solids exhibit high thermal and electrical conductivity, metallic luster, and malleability. Many...
Valence Bond Theory
Coordination compounds and complexes exhibit different colors, geometries, and magnetic behavior, depending on the metal atom/ion and ligands from which they are composed. In an attempt to explain the bonding and structure of coordination complexes, Linus Pauling proposed the valence bond theory, or VBT, using the concepts of hybridization and the overlapping of the atomic orbitals. According to VBT, the central metal atom or ion (Lewis acid) hybridizes to provide empty orbitals of suitable...
Molecular and Ionic Solids
Crystalline solids are divided into four types: molecular, ionic, metallic, and covalent network based on the type of constituent units and their interparticle interactions.
Molecular Solids
Molecular crystalline solids, such as ice, sucrose (table sugar), and iodine, are solids that are composed of neutral molecules as their constituent units. These molecules are held together by weak intermolecular forces such as London dispersion forces, dipole-dipole interactions, or hydrogen bonds, which...
Molecular Solids
Molecular crystalline solids, such as ice, sucrose (table sugar), and iodine, are solids that are composed of neutral molecules as their constituent units. These molecules are held together by weak intermolecular forces such as London dispersion forces, dipole-dipole interactions, or hydrogen bonds, which...

