Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

Retrospective Cardiac Gating with A Prototype Small-Animal X-ray Computed Tomograph
Published on: February 21, 2025
Optimal heart rate threshold for phase selection in beta-blocker-free coronary CT angiography using second-generation
Tomoro Morikawa1, Rina Sakai1, Tatsuya Saito1
1Department of Radiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Purpose:
Beta-blocker-free coronary CT angiography (CCTA) improves workflow, but is often limited by motion artifacts at higher heart rates (HRs). Advances such as faster gantry rotation and second-generation motion correction (SSF2) may overcome these limitations. We aimed to determine the optimal HR cutoff for phase selection using SSF2.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed 368 patients who underwent CCTA without beta-blockers using a 256-row CT scanner (rotation time, 0.234 s). Systolic and diastolic phases were acquired over two consecutive heartbeats, with images reconstructed with and without SSF2. Image quality was graded on a 5-point Likert scale across seven coronary segments: proximal and distal portions of the three main coronary arteries and the left main trunk. Exams were deemed evaluable when all segments scored ≥3, allowing one distal segment to score 2. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis identified the optimal HR cutoff. Diagnostic performance for ≥50% stenosis was assessed in patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography (ICA).
Results:
Among 279 patients (median HR, 64 bpm), SSF2 significantly improved image quality and evaluability in both phases (all P < 0.001). The optimal HR cutoff was 67 bpm, yielding 91.8% evaluability. At HR ≤ 67 bpm, diastolic SSF2+ images were superior (P ≤ 0.01); at HR > 67 bpm, systolic SSF2+ images were optimal (P < 0.001). In 50 patients with ICA, HR-guided phase selection achieved sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 91.3%, 88.3%, and 89.0%, respectively.
Conclusion:
SSF2 enabled reliable beta-blocker-free CCTA. An HR cutoff of 67 bpm effectively guided phase selection, achieving 91.8% evaluability.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
