Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform
Published on: April 12, 2021
Medicare Advantage's Provision of Expanded Supplemental Benefits and Acute Care Utilization
Jeah Jung1, Ge Song1, Roger Feldman2
1Department of Health Administration and Policy, College of Public Health, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.
Objective:
To examine whether Medicare Advantage (MA) plans' provision of expanded supplemental benefits reduces enrollees' acute care utilization. Expanded supplemental benefits included non-medical primarily health-related (PHR) benefits such as in-home support services, starting in 2019, and Special Supplemental Benefits for the Chronically Ill (SSBCI) such as food security and housing quality benefits, starting in 2020.
Study Setting And Design:
Quasi-experimental design using staggered difference-in-differences models. We created indicators for offering the following benefits: Any expanded PHR, ≥ 2 expanded PHR, any SSBCI, and ≥ 2 SSBCI. Acute care utilization was measured by three binary indicators of adverse health events: annual emergency department (ED) use, hospitalizations, and re-admissions.
Data Sources And Analytic Sample:
We used 2017-2022 MA encounter data from a random 20% sample of enrollees. We estimated separate models for each benefit indicator, for all non-dual and all dual-eligible enrollees, and for highly frail patients within each non-dual and dual-eligible group. We used propensity score matching to balance baseline characteristics between treatment and control groups.
Principal Findings:
Offering expanded supplemental benefits did not generally reduce acute care utilization in all non-dual or all dual-eligible enrollees. A few significant effects were relatively small or were not robust to potential differential trends between benefit-offering and not-offering plans. However, among highly frail non-dual enrollees, offering any PHR reduced re-admissions by -2.82 percentage points (95% CI: -4.78, -0.86), offering ≥ 2 expanded PHR reduced hospitalizations by -1.79 percentage points (95% CI: -2.61, -0.98) and ED use by -1.76 percentage points (95% CI: -2.38, -1.14), and offering ≥ 2 SSBCI reduced ED use by -3.51 percentage points (95% CI: -4.96, -2.05) and hospitalizations by -2.05 percentage points (95% CI: -3.12, -0.099).
Conclusions:
Provision of expanded supplemental benefits may reduce acute care utilization for certain enrollees. As spending on MA supplemental benefits rises, continued efforts are needed to assess impacts of those benefits.
Related Concept Videos
Standards of Care I
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Restorative Care
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is limited...