Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026
A New Best Practice for Validating Tail Vein Injections in Rat with Near-infrared-Labeled Agents
Published on: April 19, 2019
See, feel, fail? A prospective observational study on the accuracy of vein identification methods
Amit Bahl1,2, S Matthew Gibson2, Heather L Cook3
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, USA.
Background:
Visualization and palpation are standard methods for identifying peripheral IV sites. Vein diameter and depth significantly influence catheter dwell time and complication rates. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of visualization and palpation in determining suitability for cannulation.
Methods:
In this prospective observational study, healthy adult volunteers were enrolled from a senior recreational facility and an office setting. Two vascular access nurses independently assessed both arms of each participant using the Vascular Access Score (VAS): 1 = easily palpable, distended, visible; 2 = easily palpable, not distended, visible; 3 = easily palpable, not visible; 4 = poorly palpable, visible; 5 = nonpalpable, not visible. Scores of 1-3 were considered suitable for traditional cannulation, and scores of 4-5 were considered unsuitable, prompting escalation. Ultrasound was used to measure vein parameters with vein diameter ⩽0.3 cm and vein depth >0.4 cm considered suboptimal. Primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy.
Results:
From March 10 to April 15, 2025, 100 adults were enrolled, yielding 1000 IV site assessments. Median age was 71 years; 63% were female; median BMI 28.2 kg/m2; 93% identified as Caucasian. Mean vein depth was 0.35 cm (26.2% > 0.4 cm) and mean diameter 0.35 cm (47.8% ⩽ 0.3 cm). After adjudication, and after excluding hand and wrist sites as well as missing values, VAS distribution with 483 IV sites was 1 = 22.77%, 2 = 4.76%, 3 = 53.21%, 4 = 7.45%, 5 = 11.80%. The sensitivity of visualization/palpation method for determining if the vein was suitable for traditional insertion was 99.32%, specificity was 27.46%, PPV was 37.69%, NPV was 98.92%, and accuracy was 49.48%.
Conclusion:
Vein assessment via standard visualization/palpation effectively rules out inappropriate sites and should trigger early ultrasound escalation. However, clinically "suitable" veins are frequently suboptimal on ultrasound, supporting broader use of ultrasound to guide initial cannulation decisions.
Related Concept Videos
01:20Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
01:27Assessment of the Cardiovascular System III: Palpation
Jugular Venous Pressure (JVP) Measurement
Position the patient at a thirty- to forty-five-degree angle or in a semi-fowler's position. Look for the highest point of pulsation in the internal jugular vein and measure the vertical distance to the angle of Loius or sternal angle. A normal JVP is 3-4 cm above the...
01:17Veins of Upper Limbs
The deep venous system is primarily composed of the ulnar and radial veins. The ulnar vein, which drains the fingers through the superficial palmar venous arches, and the radial vein, which serves the palms via the deep palmar...
01:15Veins of Lower Limbs
Formed by the union of the medial and lateral plantar veins, the posterior tibial vein, rising through the calf muscle, assimilates the fibular vein. The anterior tibial vein, a superior extension of the foot's dorsalis pedis vein, merges with the posterior tibial vein at the knee,...
01:26Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
01:17Veins
Structure of Veins:
The structure of veins is specifically designed to assist in the low-pressure transportation of blood...