Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
Cancer Prevention02:59

Cancer Prevention

Several factors can increase the risk of cancer in an individual. About 50% of cancer cases can be prevented by adopting a healthy lifestyle, regular exercise, eating healthy, and following a modest cancer prevention diet. Epidemiological studies have consistently shown that populations with vegetable and fruit-rich diets have reduced the incidence of cancer. On the other hand, populations who have a diet rich in animal fat, red meat, junk food, or high calories are predisposed to cancer.
Some...
Cancer Prevention02:59

Cancer Prevention

Several factors can increase the risk of cancer in an individual. About 50% of cancer cases can be prevented by adopting a healthy lifestyle, regular exercise, eating healthy, and following a modest cancer prevention diet. Epidemiological studies have consistently shown that populations with vegetable and fruit-rich diets have reduced the incidence of cancer. On the other hand, populations who have a diet rich in animal fat, red meat, junk food, or high calories are predisposed to cancer.
Some...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Prevalence and Incidence01:08

Prevalence and Incidence

In statistical epidemiology and health sciences, two essential metrics—prevalence and incidence—are fundamental for understanding disease dynamics within a population. These measures enable public health officials, epidemiologists, and researchers to assess the burden of diseases, allocate resources effectively, and design impactful public health policies and interventions.
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health condition at a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Helicobacter pylori Infection and the Risk of Biliary Tract and Pancreatic Cancers: Subsite-Specific Associations in a Japanese Population.

International journal of cancer·2026
Same author

Serum Urate and Kidney Function in Japanese Cohorts: Mendelian Randomization and Biomarker-Dependent Associations of a URAT1 Loss-of-Function Variant.

Journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Multi-ancestry transcriptome-wide association studies uncover insights into breast cancer genetics and biology.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Genome-wide association and Mendelian randomization analyses link <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> infection to Human Leukocyte Antigen polymorphisms and autoimmune diseases.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Attributable fraction and interaction of tobacco smoking and alcohol drinking on the risk of head and neck cancer: a pooled analysis of 11 prospective cohort studies in Japan.

International journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Trends in net survival for patients with brain tumors in Japan, 2000-14 (CONCORD-3).

Japanese journal of clinical oncology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 31, 2026

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection
07:35

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection

Published on: June 8, 2020

Interpreting Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer in Japan: A Descriptive Epidemiologic Review Using Public Summary

Keitaro Matsuo1,2, Hidemi Ito3,4

  • 1Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.

Cancer Science
|May 29, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) trends in Japan show increased incidence ratios but are influenced by detection effects, not solely a rise in invasive disease. Incidence data alone is insufficient to confirm a true increase in clinically significant EOCRC.

Keywords:
cancer registrydescriptive epidemiologyearly‐onset colorectal cancerincidencemortality

More Related Videos

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 31, 2026

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection
07:35

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection

Published on: June 8, 2020

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Oncology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) is perceived as increasing, but the underlying epidemiological drivers require clarification.
  • Interpreting EOCRC trends necessitates distinguishing between detection-related effects and actual increases in invasive disease burden.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze Japanese public health data to determine if the observed EOCRC signal is primarily due to increased detection or a genuine rise in invasive cancer.
  • To compare EOCRC trends with other screening-target cancers to identify patterns.

Main Methods:

  • Descriptive epidemiology using Japanese public summary statistics from 2003-2015.
  • Analysis of age-group-specific incidence and mortality trends for colorectal cancer (CRC).
  • Decomposition of CRC incidence into invasive, in situ, and invasive plus in situ components; cross-cancer comparisons.

Main Results:

  • EOCRC showed increasing incidence ratios compared to older adults, but this was accompanied by significant increases in in situ diagnoses and limited correlation with mortality.
  • Unlike CRC, stomach and male lung cancers did not exhibit a similar early-onset increase during the study period.
  • Findings suggest substantial detection-related effects are influencing EOCRC trends, though biologic heterogeneity or increased invasive burden cannot be entirely ruled out.

Conclusions:

  • While EOCRC incidence trends are rising, they are heavily influenced by detection methods, particularly the rise in in situ diagnoses.
  • Current incidence data alone is insufficient to conclude a true increase in clinically significant EOCRC.
  • Further research is needed to differentiate detection effects from true increases in invasive early-onset colorectal cancer.