Related Experiment Video For Incidental findings
Updated: May 31, 2026
Three-Dimensional Reconstruction for the Whole Lung with Early Multiple Pulmonary Nodules
Published on: October 13, 2023
Practices in reporting incidental findings in lung cancer screening by low-dose CT: a European Survey of Radiologists
Roberta Eufrasia Ledda1,2, Emily Nischwitz3, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor3,4,5
1Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Objective:
Lung cancer screening (LCS) is complicated by a high prevalence of incidental findings (IFs), defined as abnormalities detected on low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) of the chest that are outside the scope of LCS. Although the detection of some abnormalities might lead to the diagnosis of conditions of clinical relevance, LDCT protocols are not adequate for the characterisation of most IFs and thus, further investigations are usually necessary. Thus, the detection of such findings is perceived as a double-edged sword, and radiologists still widely disagree on which IFs should be reported.
Materials And Methods:
A survey was circulated amongst radiologists involved in LCS programmes across Europe to investigate their opinions regarding the reporting of IFs, based on their personal experiences and perspectives, as well as national regulations. The responses of 147 European radiologists were included in the final analysis.
Results:
The survey revealed a lack of standardised regulations and limited awareness among European radiologists regarding IFs reporting in LCS. LDCT is perceived as unreliable for evaluating solid organs outside the mediastinum, and mandatory reporting is supported only for clinically relevant findings.
Conclusion:
With radiologists still partly disagreeing on which IFs should be reported, international evidence-based guidelines around IFs reporting and management are highly awaited but challenging.
Critical Relevance Statement:
This study critically highlights the lack of standardised regulations and consensus on IFs reporting in European LCS, underscoring the urgent need for harmonised, evidence-based guidelines to advance consistency and quality in clinical radiology practice.
Key Point:
European radiologists report a lack of standardised regulations and awareness regarding IFs in LCS. LDCT is widely perceived as unreliable for assessing solid organs outside the mediastinum, limiting support for mandatory reporting of extra-thoracic findings. International, evidence-based guidelines are urgently needed to harmonise IFs reporting and management in LCS across Europe.
Related Concept Videos
01:30Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
01:13Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...
01:25Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
01:30Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...