Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

07:52
Evaluating Postural Control and Lower-extremity Muscle Activation in Individuals with Chronic Ankle Instability
Published on: September 18, 2020
A comparative analysis of co-contraction indices using synthetic EMG data: Implications for selection and
Hannah D Carey1, Friedl De Groote2, Andrew Sawers1
1Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Plos One
|May 29, 2026
Summary
This study categorizes co-contraction indices (CCIs) into shape-based, amplitude-driven, and temporal types. Recommendations are provided for selecting and interpreting these indices to improve analysis of muscle activation and movement.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Motor Control
- Electromyography (EMG) analysis
Background:
- Co-contraction, the simultaneous activation of opposing muscles, is crucial for movement efficiency, joint stability, and motor learning.
- Existing guidelines for EMG signal acquisition and processing lack comprehensive recommendations for quantifying co-contraction.
- This gap hinders consistent and accurate analysis of muscle coordination.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the behavior and interrelationships of six common co-contraction indices (CCIs).
- To develop practical recommendations for the selection, calculation, and interpretation of CCIs.
- To establish a framework for robust analysis of muscle co-contraction.
Main Methods:
- Generation of synthetic EMG-like signals to simulate various experimental conditions.
- Classification of CCIs into three categories: shape-based, amplitude-driven, and temporal.
- Correlation analyses to assess relationships between different CCIs and their sensitivity to EMG features.
Main Results:
- CCIs were categorized based on their sensitivity to signal shape, amplitude, or temporal overlap.
- Normalization techniques significantly impacted CCI estimates, with varying effects across indices.
- Direct comparison of CCI values is not recommended due to differences in scale and theoretical maxima.
Conclusions:
- The choice of CCI should align with the specific research question and expected EMG signal characteristics.
- Researchers should test the robustness of their findings across different normalization methods.
- Standardized guidelines for CCI selection and interpretation are needed to advance the field of motor control research.

