Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health
Published on: February 21, 2025
Older age and sex differences in the proportion of vital signs flagged as abnormal
Jean-Philippe Emond1,2, Vincent Weng-Jy Cheung1, Ariel Mundo Ortiz1
1Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Background:
The variability of vital signs thresholds has not been well described in relation to older age and sex assigned at birth. Significant variations may influence clinical interpretation of vital signs, most notably the thresholds at which investigations or treatments are initiated. Our objective was to compare, in stable health status, the percentage of abnormal values (flagging percentage) of standard vital signs thresholds of adults aged 45 years and older and to determine centile-based thresholds by age and sex.
Methods:
A retrospective observational study was conducted using data from the Centre for the Integration and Analysis of Medical Data (CITADEL) at the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), a tertiary care hospital. All inpatients and outpatients, from January 2012 to December 2021, were included. For individuals with multiple visits, a single hospitalization or a single outpatient visit was selected at random for inclusion. To reflect a stable health status, the last vital signs recorded before hospital discharge were selected and in-hospital deaths were excluded. Flagging percentages were identified using a quantile-based approach. Age and sex specific centile-based thresholds were determined by identifying values at the 2.5th and 97.5th centiles. Flagging percentages and centile values for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, and temperature were analyzed by age group (45-54, 55-64, 65-74, 75-84, and 85 + years) and sex.
Results:
The sample comprised 123,420 individuals, including 90,813 inpatients. Flagging percentages for the standard threshold of upper systolic blood pressure (140 mmHg) ranged from 13.3 (12.7-13.9) % (45-54y assigned female at birth (AFAB)) to 39.8 (38.6-41.0) % (85y+ AFAB). Flagging percentages for standard thresholds ranged between 0.1 (0.1-0.2) to 1.2 (1.0-1.4) % for upper temperature (37.8°C), lower temperature (35.0°C), and lower systolic blood pressure (90 mmHg). Across subgroups, the 97.5th centile-based adapted thresholds varied between 158 (156-159) - 178 (177-180) mmHg for upper systolic blood pressure and between 37.2 (37.1-37.2) - 37.3 (37.3-37.3) °C for upper temperature.
Conclusions:
Important differences in vital signs flagging percentages may affect their comparability by vital sign, age, and sex. Standard thresholds may need to be reassessed using clinical outcomes to factor age and sex differences.
Related Concept Videos
Introduction to Vital Signs
Vital signs help healthcare professionals assess an individual's well-being and detect any functional changes or...
Pharmacodynamics in Geriatric Patients: Effects of Age
Guidelines For Measuring Vital Signs
Before taking a patient's vital signs, a nurse would consider and assess the patient's comfort level and ensure appropriate equipment is available.
Cardiovascular System Abnormal Findings I: Inspection and Palpation
Abnormal findings observed during an inspection
Pharmacokinetics in Geriatric Patients: Effect of Age on Drug Distribution
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.

