Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

03:49
Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation in High-Frequency Hearing Loss via Electric Acoustic Stimulation with Longer Electrode
Published on: October 11, 2024
Use of Envelope Following Response Normative Ranges for Diagnosing Cochlear Deafferentation
Anne E Heassler1, Garnett P McMillan1, Sean D Kampel1
1VA National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, OR.
American Journal of Audiology
|May 29, 2026
Summary
Establishing normative ranges for envelope following responses (EFRs) aids in diagnosing cochlear deafferentation. A 4-kHz rectangular amplitude-modulated EFR effectively identified Veterans with potential auditory deficits.
Area of Science:
- Auditory Neuroscience
- Audiology
- Clinical Diagnostics
Background:
- Cochlear synaptopathy, a form of cochlear deafferentation, is difficult to diagnose due to a lack of established clinical tools.
- The envelope following response (EFR) shows promise as a diagnostic indicator for deafferentation, but abnormal EFR criteria are not well-defined.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish normative ranges for EFR magnitude in a low-risk population.
- To compare EFRs in a high-risk population against these normative ranges to identify potential deafferentation.
Main Methods:
- Normative EFR ranges were generated using rectangular amplitude-modulated (RAM) or sinusoidal amplitude-modulated stimuli in young adults with normal hearing and low noise exposure.
- EFRs were measured in military Veterans with normal audiograms but auditory complaints (tinnitus, sound tolerance issues, speech-in-noise difficulties).
- EFR data were adjusted for sex and distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) levels.
Main Results:
- The 4-kHz RAM EFR provided the greatest distinction between low-risk and high-risk groups, with 31%-34% of Veterans falling below the normative range.
- Adjusting for DPOAEs did not consistently alter normative ranges across different conditions.
- Computational models suggest DPOAE adjustment may be unnecessary for individuals with normal audiograms.
Conclusions:
- Defined normative ranges for the 4-kHz RAM EFR can facilitate clinical identification of cochlear deafferentation in patients with normal audiograms.
- This diagnostic tool could help identify individuals experiencing auditory deficits despite normal hearing thresholds.

