Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
Published on: May 31, 2019
PEEC: The Protected Entities Ethics Checklist for Collecting Speech Data From Vulnerable Clinical Populations
Anna Seo Gyeong Choi1, Sunghye Cho2, Iris Nowenstein3
1Department of Information Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Developing fair automatic speech recognition (ASR) requires ethical data collection from vulnerable populations. The Protected Entities Ethics Checklist (PEEC) framework ensures procedural justice, leading to equitable AI systems in clinical speech research.
Area of Science:
- Speech and Language Technology
- Clinical Research Ethics
- Artificial Intelligence
Background:
- Advancements in automatic speech recognition (ASR) and natural language processing offer clinical potential but are limited to high-resource settings.
- Ethical considerations at the intersection of clinical vulnerability, linguistic diversity, and speech technology are often overlooked.
- Data collection practices directly impact the fairness and bias of ASR systems, linking participant protection to algorithmic justice.
Purpose of the Study:
- Introduce the Protected Entities Ethics Checklist (PEEC), a framework for ethical speech and language data collection from protected populations.
- Address ethical challenges in collecting data from vulnerable groups for ASR and natural language processing applications.
- Establish ethical data collection as a prerequisite for developing fair and equitable AI systems in clinical speech research.
Main Methods:
- Developed the Protected Entities Ethics Checklist (PEEC) framework.
- Structured the PEEC around three core domains: participant protection and consent, data collection standards, and compliance implementation.
- Incorporated population-specific guidance for consent, data protection, quality assurance, and technical considerations for ASR.
Main Results:
- The PEEC provides structured guidance for ethical research with diverse protected entities, including children, elderly adults, individuals with communication disorders, and marginalized communities.
- Offers population-specific consent mechanisms and enhanced data protection measures.
- Includes systematic quality assurance and technical guidance for ASR applications, adaptable to various research contexts.
Conclusions:
- Ethical participant treatment is fundamental to achieving algorithmic fairness in speech technology.
- Procedural justice in data collection is essential for creating fair AI systems.
- Equitable and respectful data collection practices lay the foundation for ASR systems that perform fairly across diverse populations.
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Standards II
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy and...
Ethics and Bioethics
Ethical Standards I
The Code of Ethics provisions outline the nurse's duty to the patient, the healthcare team, the profession, and society. The Code's fundamental principles include advocacy,...
Legal Guidelines for Documentation
Ethics in Research
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's cancer...
