Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
Published on: May 31, 2019
PEEC: The Protected Entities Ethics Checklist for Collecting Speech Data From Vulnerable Clinical Populations
Anna Seo Gyeong Choi1, Sunghye Cho2, Iris Nowenstein3
1Department of Information Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Purpose:
The rapid advancement of automatic speech recognition (ASR) and natural language processing technologies has created significant opportunities for clinical applications within speech and language disorders, yet these capabilities remain largely confined to high-resource languages and populations. As research communities work to address these inequities through inclusive speech data collection, the intersection of clinical vulnerability, linguistic diversity, and emerging speech and language technologies creates ethical considerations that are rarely addressed by existing guidelines. Ethical data collection practices affect the fairness and bias profiles of automatic speech and language analysis systems trained on these data, creating a foundational link between participant protection and algorithmic justice.
Method:
This article introduces the Protected Entities Ethics Checklist (PEEC), a comprehensive framework specifically designed for researchers collecting speech and language data from populations requiring enhanced protections. The framework addresses three core domains: participant protection and consent, data collection standards, and compliance implementation. Critically, the PEEC situates ethical data collection as a prerequisite for developing fair ASR systems, recognizing that procedural justice in research must precede algorithmic fairness.
Results:
The PEEC framework provides structured guidance for ethical research with protected entities including children, elderly adults with cognitive changes, individuals with communication disorders, and marginalized communities. It offers population-specific consent mechanisms, enhanced data protection measures, systematic quality assurance procedures, and explicit guidance on technical considerations for ASR applications while maintaining flexibility for diverse research contexts.
Conclusions:
Ethical treatment of research participants is inextricably linked to algorithmic fairness in speech technology development. The PEEC framework argues that procedural justice in data collection is a prerequisite for achieving fair AI systems, establishing the necessary ethical foundation for subsequent technological development in clinical speech research. By ensuring equitable and respectful data collection practices, we create the foundation for ASR systems that perform equitably across diverse populations.
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Standards II
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy and...
Ethics and Bioethics
Ethical Standards I
The Code of Ethics provisions outline the nurse's duty to the patient, the healthcare team, the profession, and society. The Code's fundamental principles include advocacy,...
Legal Guidelines for Documentation
Ethics in Research
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's cancer...
