Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology
Published on: September 28, 2022
Racial and ethnic diversity in clinical studies reported to ClinicalTrials.gov, 2009-2024
Maryam Aziz1, Emily C O'Brien1,2, Jay B Lusk3
1Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Objective:
A lack of transparent reporting of race and ethnicity in clinical research limits the ability to identify health inequities and evaluate to what extent clinical research includes diverse populations. Our objectives are: (1) to identify study characteristics associated with reporting race and ethnicity of clinical study participants and (2) to document temporal trends in race and ethnicity reporting on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Design:
Cross-sectional analysis of interventional trials and observational studies from 2009 to 2024; multivariable logistic regression assessed study-level factors associated with reporting race and ethnicity.
Setting:
Global registry of clinical studies (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Participants:
58 163 studies with posted results and without early termination.
Exposures:
Study characteristics: sponsor trial phase, study type and country.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
Reporting of race, reporting of ethnicity, reporting of both.
Results:
Among 58163 studies (mean enrolment=1215 participants), 44.8% did not report race or ethnicity to the repository (mean enrolment=1481 participants). The proportion of studies reporting both race and ethnicity rose from 7.4% in 2013 to 54.6% in 2024. In multivariable models, observational studies had lower odds of reporting race and ethnicity (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.61) compared with interventional trials. Phase 4 trials were least likely phase to report race and ethnicity (OR=0.32; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.35), and studies with only National Institute of Health funding were more likely to report race and ethnicity compared with studies with any industry funding or sponsorship (OR=1.70, 95% CI 1.61 to 1.79). For studies that reported race, White participants comprised ≥50% each year based on study-level percentages; proportions of Asian participants declined, and Black participants fluctuated. 'Not Hispanic or Latino' remained ≥80% of reported ethnicity annually.
Conclusions:
Race and ethnicity reporting on ClinicalTrials.gov has improved markedly yet remains incomplete, with shortfalls in late-phase and observational studies.
More Related Videos
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...
Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Changes in Skin Color: Clinical Perspectives
Albinism
Albinism is a genetic disorder that affects (completely or partially) the coloring of skin, hair, and eyes. The defect is primarily...