Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
Psychometric validation and measurement invariance of the Polish Multi-Affect Indicator across diverse demographic
Arkadiusz M Jasiński1, Romuald Derbis2, Radosław Andrzej Dziedzic3
1Institute of Psychology, University of Opole, pl. Staszica 1, Opole, 45-052, Poland. arkadiusz.jasinski@uni.opole.pl.
Abstract:
The present study investigated the psychometric properties and validity of the Polish adaptation of the Multi-Affect Indicator (MAI), a scale designed to measure core affect at work. Specifically, we examined: (a) factor structure; (b) measurement invariance across sex, age, occupational group, and administration mode; (c) intergroup differences in work-related affective well-being; (d) internal, convergent, and discriminant validity; and (e) temporal stability. We conducted three studies with employee samples from diverse occupational sectors (N1 = 1,582; N2 = 326; N3 = 76). Results supported a correlated four-factor model consistent with the original MAI structure. In Study 1, the scale demonstrated scalar invariance across sex, age, and occupational groups, with strict invariance supported for sex and occupational group. In Study 2, the factor structure was replicated, and invariance analyses supported comparability across sex and occupational groups, although occupational-group results should be interpreted cautiously because some absolute-fit indices were elevated. The scale also achieved scalar invariance between the online Study 1 sample and the paper-and-pencil Study 2 sample. The Polish MAI demonstrated strong internal consistency, evidence of convergent and discriminant validity, and moderate one-week temporal stability. Overall, the results support the Polish MAI as a reliable and valid tool for assessing multidimensional affective well-being in occupational settings.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Reliability and Validity
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this; it...
Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring
Stereotype Content Model
