Related Experiment Videos
A virtual patient-based training program to enhance clinical decision-making competencies in general practice
Yuanshuai Chen1, Leyi Jiang2, Lingyan Wu2
1Department of Artificial Intelligence and Information, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 88, Jiefang Rd, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, 310009, China.
BMC Medical Education
|May 29, 2026
Summary
Virtual patient (VP) training improved general practice residents' clinical knowledge, history-taking, and clinical reasoning skills. However, it showed limited impact on physical examination and medical record writing, suggesting areas for future curriculum development.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- General Practice Training
- Clinical Decision-Making
Background:
- Clinical decision-making (CDM) is crucial for general practice (GP) residents.
- Traditional training offers limited deliberate practice for CDM skills.
- Virtual patient (VP) platforms offer risk-free environments for skill development.
Purpose of the Study:
- Evaluate the effectiveness of a structured VP training program for GP residents' CDM competencies.
- Explore residents' perceptions of the VP program's value.
- Identify barriers to developing CDM competencies using VP platforms.
Main Methods:
- Explanatory sequential mixed-methods design: quantitative pre-post assessment followed by qualitative interviews.
- 12-week curriculum: 50 GP residents completed weekly VP cases and facilitated workshops.
- Assessments included OSCEs (history-taking, physical examination, clinical reasoning, medical record writing) and a theoretical test; focus groups explored experiences.
Main Results:
- Significant improvements observed in clinical knowledge (mean increase 6.7 points), history-taking (mean diff.=10.2), and clinical reasoning (mean diff.=11.2).
- No statistically significant improvements in physical examination (mean diff.=2.4) or medical record writing (mean diff.=1.2).
- Residents valued the structured design for diagnostic reasoning and reflective learning; barriers included technological fidelity, documentation, skill transfer, and workshop variability.
Conclusions:
- Structured VP curriculum enhances GP residents' clinical knowledge, history-taking, and clinical reasoning.
- Limited impact on physical examination and medical record writing suggests need for technological advancement.
- Future efforts should focus on enhancing realism, optimizing integration, and assessing long-term competency transfer.