Differences in inpatient hypertension management practices between specialists and non-specialists in Zhejiang Province, China
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Improved Home Blood Pressure Control by CT-guided Ozone-mediated Renal Denervation for Patients with Resistant Hypertension
Published on: June 6, 2025
Yue Wu1,2, Cheng Tong3, Jie Wang2,4
1The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, China.
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the differences in management practices for hospitalised hypertensive patients between cardiovascular specialists and non-specialists, identify key determinants affecting the quality of blood pressure (BP) control, and offer evidence-based recommendations to support the standardisation of hypertension management protocols. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the medical records of 500 inpatients with essential hypertension at Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital in January 2022. BP control rates, drug adjustments and monitoring practices were compared between specialist and non-specialist treatment groups. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 25.0, with variance analysis for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of BP control at discharge. Results At admission, the overall BP control rate was 36.2%, with no significant difference between the non-specialist and specialist groups (37.5% vs. 34.0%, p > 0.05). At discharge, the specialist group demonstrated a significantly higher BP control rate than the non-specialist group (72.9% vs. 63.0%, p < 0.05). The specialist group also showed significantly higher rates of drug adjustment (72.9% vs. 20.2%), combination therapy (84.0% vs. 49.8%), and completeness of discharge instructions (90.4% vs. 28.5%) compared to the non-specialist group (all p < 0.01). In multivariable logistic regression, specialist care remained independently associated with achieving target BP (aOR = 1.755, 95% CI: 1.129-2.728, p = 0.012), while diabetes, stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA), chronic kidney disease (CKD) and higher hypertension grade were identified as independent risk factors for poor BP control. Conclusions Cardiovascular specialists achieved significantly better BP control through more frequent drug adjustments and optimised combination therapy regimens. Non-specialists exhibited deficiencies in monitoring, medication regimen optimisation and follow-up management. It is recommended to enhance standardised training for non-specialists in hypertension management to improve overall hypertension prevention and control.
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Hypertension V: Nursing Management
Hypertension IV: Drug Therapy and Lifestyle Modifications
Hypertension I: Introduction
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.