Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 1, 2026
High-frequency Ultrasound Imaging of Mouse Cervical Lymph Nodes
Published on: July 25, 2015
Diagnostic Performance and Operator Workload of Core Needle Biopsy Versus Fine-Needle Aspiration for Superficial
Qinxian Zhao1, Qiong Meng2, Zhen Wang1
1Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, China (Q.Z., Z.W.).
Rationale And Objectives:
Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) are established techniques for evaluating superficial lymphadenopathy. While diagnostic accuracy has been extensively compared, the operator workload associated with these procedures has not been quantitatively assessed. To prospectively compare diagnostic performance, safety, and operator workload between ultrasound-guided CNB and FNA for superficial lymph nodes, and to identify risk factors for missed diagnosis and high mental demand.
Materials And Methods:
This prospective study enrolled 285 patients undergoing both CNB and FNA on the same abnormal superficial lymph node from January to June 2025. All procedures were performed by a single radiologist. Procedure time, pain (3-point scale), bleeding (4-point scale), and operator workload (NASA-TLX) were recorded. Sample adequacy and diagnostic performance were calculated using surgical pathology or ≥6-month follow-up as reference. Multivariate analysis identified factors for high mental demand (NASA-TLX ≥50) and missed diagnosis.
Results:
All 285 patients (mean age, 57.2 years; 53.3% female) were analyzed. CNB achieved higher sample adequacy (97.9% vs. 94.0%; P = 0.03) and superior sensitivity (96.2% vs. 90.4%; P = 0.01) and accuracy (97.0% vs. 92.5%; P = 0.01) than FNA. Specificity was 100% for both. FNA was faster (88.3 vs. 176.0 s; P < 0.001) and associated with less pain (P < 0.001) and bleeding (P < 0.001). CNB imposed higher workload across four NASA-TLX domains (all P < 0.001). Procedure time predicted high mental demand for CNB (OR = 1.01; P = 0.03). Distance to target node (OR = 38.03; P = 0.01) and arterial pulsation (OR = 21.59; P = 0.02) predicted missed diagnosis for CNB; distance alone predicted for FNA (OR = 4.81; P = 0.01).
Conclusion:
CNB offers superior diagnostic accuracy but incurs higher workload and bleeding risk. FNA is preferable when speed and patient comfort are prioritized. Technique selection should be individualized based on nodal characteristics.
Clinical Impact:
Technique selection for superficial lymph node biopsy should be individualized based on nodal characteristics, balancing diagnostic accuracy, patient safety, and operator cognitive burden.
