Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Establishment and Characterization of Three Afatinib-resistant Lung Adenocarcinoma PC-9 Cell Lines Developed with Increasing Doses of Afatinib
Published on: June 26, 2019
Afatinib Versus Osimertinib for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Uncommon EGFR Mutations: Real-World Outcomes
Yutaro Nagano1, Hiroshi Yokouchi2, Ryota Saito3
1Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Abstract:
Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) harboring uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations (UMs) are clinically heterogeneous, and the optimal first-line EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), as well as the role of subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based regimens, remains uncertain. We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study including patients with advanced or recurrent non-squamous NSCLC harboring UMs who received first-line afatinib or osimertinib between January 2015 and January 2024 at 29 hospitals in Japan, excluding exon 20 insertions and de novo T790M mutations. Inverse probability of treatment weighting adjusted baseline imbalances, and post-EGFR-TKI treatment patterns were evaluated. Among 162 patients (afatinib, n = 95; osimertinib, n = 67), weighted analyses demonstrated no significant differences in time to treatment failure (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-1.77) or overall survival (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.73-2.44). Afatinib was associated with higher response rates and more frequent adverse events requiring dose reduction. Subgroup analyses suggested differential treatment effects according to mutation subtype, with osimertinib favoring L861X mutations and afatinib favoring compound mutations. Among 56 patients who received subsequent systemic therapy, clinical outcomes were comparable between ICI plus platinum doublet and platinum doublet alone. These findings indicate that afatinib and osimertinib provide comparable survival outcomes as first-line therapies for NSCLC with UMs, with treatment effects varying by molecular subtype, while subsequent ICI-based regimens may confer limited additional benefit.
Insights
Afatinib and osimertinib show similar survival for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with uncommon EGFR mutations. Treatment effectiveness varies by mutation subtype, and subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitors offer limited benefit.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genomics
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations presents heterogeneous clinical challenges.
- Optimal first-line EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) and the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remain unclear for these patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of first-line afatinib versus osimertinib in advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients with uncommon EGFR mutations.
- To evaluate the impact of subsequent therapies, including ICI-based regimens, after initial EGFR-TKI treatment.
Main Methods:
- Multicenter retrospective cohort study of 162 patients with advanced or recurrent non-squamous NSCLC and uncommon EGFR mutations (excluding exon 20 insertions and de novo T790M).
- Patients received either first-line afatinib or osimertinib between January 2015 and January 2024.
- Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for baseline imbalances; treatment patterns and outcomes were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Weighted analyses revealed no significant differences in time to treatment failure (HR 1.04) or overall survival (HR 1.34) between afatinib and osimertinib.
- Afatinib was associated with higher response rates but more frequent adverse events requiring dose reduction.
- Subgroup analyses indicated differential effects: osimertinib favored L861X mutations, while afatinib favored compound mutations.
- Subsequent ICI plus platinum doublet therapy showed comparable outcomes to platinum doublet alone in 56 patients.
Conclusions:
- Afatinib and osimertinib offer comparable survival outcomes as first-line treatments for NSCLC with uncommon EGFR mutations.
- Treatment efficacy is influenced by specific molecular subtypes.
- Subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitor-based regimens appear to provide limited additional survival benefit.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistent Cancers
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Endothelin Receptor Antagonists
ETs are synthesized through a complex sequence of enzymatic steps, primarily involving an enzyme referred to as endothelin-converting enzyme (ECE). Of...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...

