Additivity, Not Synergy, Underlies the Efficacy of Current Combination Regimens in Urothelial Cancer
Noah M Schlachter1, Eric J Miller2, Jonathan F Anker2
1Department of Pharmacology, Computational Medicine Program, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Abstract:
PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination regimens have transformed metastatic urothelial cancer treatment. However, phase III trials of these regimens have shown varied results. We sought to understand these differences by assessing whether these combinations are synergistic, additive, or less-than-additive, which is crucial for translational research and clinical development. We systematically identified five randomized phase III trials of ICI-based combinations for metastatic urothelial carcinoma and tested whether progression-free survival (PFS) distributions of combinations were as predicted by a null hypothesis of additivity, defined as the sum of PFS durations of individual drugs. For KEYNOTE-361 and IMvigor130, which allowed cisplatin or carboplatin, we evaluated platinum-specific predictions. We found that PFS distributions in trials adding PD-1/PD-L1 ICI to enfortumab vedotin (EV-302), gemcitabine plus cisplatin (CheckMate 901), or CTLA-4 blockade (DANUBE) were statistically indistinguishable from additivity. In trials using choice of cisplatin or carboplatin (KEYNOTE-361, IMvigor130), ICI combinations with cisplatin-gemcitabine yielded additive PFS, whereas ICI combinations with carboplatin-gemcitabine yielded less-than-additive PFS, indicating that carboplatin blunts the potential benefits of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. The predictable success of EV-302 and CheckMate 901 demonstrate that substantial improvements in clinical outcomes can be achieved by additive combinations of individually effective agents. Overall, modeling PFS from single-agent data could have anticipated most contemporary phase III trial outcomes, potentially informing rational trial design and prioritization.
Significance:
Practice-changing PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint combinations in urothelial cancer show additive, not synergistic, efficacy in phase III trials. However, carboplatin was significantly less-than-additive with immunotherapy, helping explain negative results of KEYNOTE-361 and IMvigor130.
Related Concept Videos
Combined Effects of Drugs: Synergism
Such synergistic combinations...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Agonism and Antagonism: Quantification
To quantify these effects, researchers use a dose-response curve, which provides valuable information about the potency and efficacy of a drug. Potency refers to...
Dose-Response Relationship: Potency and Efficacy
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...


