Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Routine Omega-3 Testing and Targeted Supplementation to Reduce Early

Hossein Haji Ali Afzali1, Ecushla Linedale1,2,3, Craig Martin4

  • 1School of Public Health, Adelaide University, Adelaide, Australia.

Insights

Routine omega-3 testing and supplementation in early pregnancy can significantly reduce early preterm births. This strategy is cost-effective, preventing hundreds of births and saving millions in healthcare costs.

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Nutritional Science
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Preterm birth is a major global health concern, leading to infant mortality and long-term health issues.
  • Omega-3 supplementation in early pregnancy can lower the risk of preterm birth, especially early preterm birth (<34 weeks).
  • The economic impact of integrating omega-3 testing and supplementation into Australian antenatal care is not well understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of routine omega-3 testing and targeted supplementation versus current practices in Australia.
  • To model the potential reduction in early preterm births and associated healthcare cost savings.

Main Methods:

  • A decision analytic model was developed using Australian data on epidemiology, clinical outcomes, and costs.
  • The model projected outcomes over an 18-year period.
  • Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the impact of uncertainties in key model parameters.

Main Results:

  • An estimated 17.5% of nearly 290,000 singleton pregnancies in 2022 were eligible for omega-3 supplementation.
  • The model predicted that omega-3 testing and supplementation would prevent 640 early preterm births.
  • This strategy was projected to save $26.1 million in direct healthcare costs, demonstrating a dominant economic advantage.

Conclusions:

  • Omega-3 testing and targeted supplementation present a scalable, cost-effective approach to reducing early preterm birth.
  • The strategy offers significant health benefits for mothers and infants, alongside economic advantages for the healthcare system.
  • The modeled cost savings are robust, supporting the national implementation of this intervention.
Abstract