Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Palatable Western-style Cafeteria Diet as a Reliable Method for Modeling Diet-induced Obesity in Rodents
Published on: November 1, 2019
Protein- and nutrient-normalized environmental footprints of university canteen meals
Merve Çapaş1,2, Sukru Taner Azgin2,3
1Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Türkiye.
Background:
The environmental sustainability of institutional diets is increasingly recognized as a core concern in nutrition science, as food service settings influence population-level dietary patterns. University canteens offer a strategic opportunity to align nutritional quality with environmental sustainability through evidence-based menu planning.
Objectives:
This study assessed the carbon and water footprints of meals served in a large university canteen system using a life cycle assessment (LCA) approach, integrated with nutritional composition analysis and secondary protein-based normalization to inform sustainable diet planning.
Methods:
A total of 150 standardized recipes served in Erciyes University canteens in 2023 were evaluated. Ninety-five individual ingredients were modeled using SimaPro within a cradle-to-kitchen system boundary. Nutritional composition was calculated using the BEBİS database. Environmental impacts were first calculated per standardized serving using a cradle-to-kitchen LCA framework, then compared across meal groups and seasons; additionally, results were secondarily normalized by energy and protein content to explore nutrient-informed environmental efficiency.
Results:
Significant differences were observed among meal groups for both carbon and water footprints (p < 0.001). Meat-based dishes, pastries, desserts, and yogurt-based meals exhibited the highest average carbon footprints (up to approximately 1.4 kg CO₂e per portion), whereas legume-based dishes, salads, olive oil-based vegetable meals, and compotes consistently showed the lowest values (<0.4 kg CO₂e). Seasonal variation in carbon footprint was statistically significant but modest (p = 0.032), with higher values observed in autumn and lower values in summer, while nutritional composition remained relatively stable across seasons. Energy-based normalization reduced between-group differences, whereas protein-based normalization amplified contrasts, identifying legumes as the most environmentally efficient protein sources.
Conclusion:
Meal composition-particularly protein source and nutritional density-is a primary determinant of environmental impact in university food services. Incorporating protein- and nutrient-based normalization into LCA-based environmental assessments represents a conceptual advance by linking environmental performance directly to nutritional function, thereby supporting nutritionally informed strategies for sustainable menu planning in institutional settings.
Related Concept Videos
Energy Balance
Key Elements for Plant Nutrition
Optimal Foraging
Production Efficiency