Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Osmotic Drug Delivery to Ischemic Hindlimbs and Perfusion of Vasculature with Microfil for Micro-Computed Tomography Imaging
Published on: June 29, 2013
Management of femoral large-bore access and closure during microaxial flow pump-supported interventions
Rocco Vergallo1,2, Marco Lombardi1,3, Andrea Macchione2
1Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), Università di Genova, Genova, Italy.
Insights
Managing large-bore arterial access for microaxial flow pumps (mAFP) is crucial for preventing complications. This review outlines strategies for safe femoral access and closure in cardiogenic shock and high-risk PCI patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Vascular Surgery
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Microaxial flow pumps (mAFP) are vital for hemodynamic support in cardiogenic shock (CS) and high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (HR-PCI).
- Large-bore arterial access required for mAFP implantation poses significant risks of vascular complications, increasing morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs.
- Effective vascular access and closure strategies are essential for optimizing patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a contemporary, practical framework for managing femoral large-bore access and closure in patients undergoing mAFP implantation.
- To highlight the importance of imaging guidance and tailored closure techniques based on clinical scenarios (CS vs. HR-PCI).
Main Methods:
- Review of current literature and clinical practices regarding femoral access and closure in mAFP procedures.
- Discussion of imaging modalities (ultrasound, angiography) for safe puncture.
- Analysis of pre-closure versus post-closure techniques in different patient populations.
Main Results:
- Ultrasound- and angiography-guided puncture, with advanced imaging, improves femoral access safety.
- Pre-closure techniques are recommended prophylactically in the HR-PCI setting.
- Post-closure techniques are critical during mAFP removal in CS patients when pre-closure is not feasible.
Conclusions:
- Optimizing mAFP outcomes necessitates meticulous management of femoral large-bore access and closure.
- Tailoring closure strategies to patient conditions (CS vs. HR-PCI) is paramount for minimizing vascular complications.
- This review offers a practical guide for clinicians managing these complex vascular access scenarios.
Abstract:
Microaxial flow pump (mAFP) is increasingly employed for hemodynamic support in both cardiogenic shock (CS) and high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (HR-PCI). However, its implantation requires large-bore arterial access, which carries a substantial risk of vascular complications, translating into higher morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Optimizing outcomes depends on safe vascular access and effective closure strategies. Ultrasound- and angiography-guided puncture, often complemented by advanced imaging, enhance the safety of femoral access. In the HR-PCI setting, pre-closure techniques are generally feasible and advisable as a prophylactic strategy. Conversely, in CS patients, where pre-closure is frequently not achievable, post-closure techniques during mAFP removal play a pivotal role. This review provides a contemporary, practical framework to manage femoral large-bore access and closure in patients undergoing mechanical circulatory support with mAFP.

