Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Rapid and Specific Detection of Acinetobacter baumannii Infections Using a Recombinase Polymerase Amplification/Cas12a-based System
Published on: April 25, 2025
Development of a multiplex recombinase polymerase amplification combined with a DNA strip for the rapid detection of
Pattharasak Thaweesub1,2, Aroonlug Lulitanond1, Aroonwadee Chanawong1
1Centre for Research and Development of Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Background:
Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), particularly Enterococcus faecium and E. faecalis, are responsible for various human infections and represent a significant global public health concern in both nosocomial and community settings. To facilitate early detection of these pathogens, we developed a rapid method for detecting E. faecium, E. faecalis, and vancomycin resistance genes (vanA and vanB) in a single reaction using multiplex recombinase polymerase amplification (M-RPA) combined with a chromatographic printed-array strip (C-PAS).
Methods:
A total of 106 samples, including 46 E. faecium (35 vanA-type and one vanB-type strains), 39 E. faecalis (one vanA-type and two vanB-type strains), four Enterococcus spp., and 17 non-Enterococcus spp. isolates were tested using the M-RPA-C-PAS method and compared with the conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. Specific tagged and biotinylated M-RPA primers were designed for detecting ddl (E. faecium), sodA (E. faecalis), vanA, and vanB. The M-RPA reaction was performed under isothermal conditions at 37 °C for 20 min, and visual detection using the C-PAS for DNA signal detection within another 20 min. The performance of the M-RPA-C-PAS was initially evaluated in 12 spiked rectal swabs and 12 positive blood culture samples from patients compared with the PCR method.
Results:
Compared with the PCR-based method, the M-RPA-C-PAS method demonstrated sensitivities of 95.7%, 94.9%, and 100.0% and specificities of 100.0%, 92.5%, and 100.0% for ddl, sodA, and vanA, respectively, and 93.2% specificity for vanB. The lower detection limits of the M-RPA-C-PAS method for detecting the ddl and sodA genes were 10⁴ and 10³ CFU/mL, respectively, whereas those of the PCR method were 10⁵ and 10⁴ CFU/mL, respectively. The lower limit of detection of both methods for vanA and vanB was 10⁴ CFU/mL. The M-RPA-C-PAS assay showed 100% agreement with PCR for identifying the four genes in the spiked and clinical samples.
Conclusion:
The M-RPA-C-PAS method is an alternative rapid approach with high sensitivity and specificity, demonstrating comparable performance to conventional PCR. Therefore, the M-RPA-C-PAS method represents a promising point-of-care diagnostic tool for the rapid detection of VRE, supporting timely clinical management and infection control strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Automated Microbial Diagnostics
Rapid Identification of Pathogens
