Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Effects of a Novel Neuromuscular Training Intervention on Jump, Sprint, and Change of Direction in Adult Female Soccer Players
Published on: June 10, 2025
Effects of Complex and Contrast Training on Lower Limb Explosive Power and Eccentric Strength in Elite Male Track and
Zhiyi Xu1, Yu Lin, Fucheng Zhang
1School of Physical Education, Jimei University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Abstract:
Xu, Z, Lin, Y, Zhang, F, Li, Q, Yu, L, Lin, M, Ning, F, and Wang, X. Effects of complex and contrast training on lower limb explosive power and eccentric strength in elite male track and field athletes: A 24-week randomized trial. J Strength Cond Res 40(8): e876-e886, 2026-This 24-week randomized controlled trial compared the effects of complex training (postactivation potentiation) and contrast training (postactivation performance enhancement) on lower-limb explosive power (jump height, push-off power) and eccentric strength (drop height, countermovement impulse) in track and field athletes, while assessing arm swing's role in kinetic chain coordination. Forty-five national-level track and field athletes were randomized into complex training, contrast training, or control groups. Kinetic data were collected using a 3-dimensional force plate. Repeated-measures ANOVA and multivariate regression (Δ R2 ) analyzed intervention effects under arm-swing and non-arm-swing conditions, with cross-group comparisons. Cross-group analyses showed complex training significantly outperformed contrast training and control in jump height with arm swing (+30.9%, 0.55-0.72 m, P < 0.001 vs. +17.1%, 0.58-0.68 m, P = 0.012 vs. +7.7%, 0.52-0.56 m, P = 0.231) and drop height (+30.4%, 0.46-0.60 m, P < 0.001 vs. +15.2%, 0.46-0.53 m, P = 0.031 vs. +5.2%, 0.46-0.48 m, P = 0.672). Contrast training excelled in reducing push-off time without arm swing (-6.1%, 0.214-0.201 seconds, P = 0.002 vs. +1.2%, P = 0.721 vs. +0.8%, P = 0.821) and increasing push-off power (+17.1%, 122.23-129.02 W·kg -1 , P = 0.009 vs. +9.8%, P = 0.041 vs. +2.3%, P = 0.762). Arm swing enhanced eccentric-concentric efficiency, with complex training showing stronger correlations (push-off power vs. jump height: r = 0.527, P < 0.001). Eccentric strength explained 43.1% of jump height variance ( R2 = 0.431, P < 0.001). Complex training enhances elastic energy storage, whereas contrast training improves neural coordination. The results support tailored training based on eccentric strength and sport-specific needs.
More Related Videos
12:59Improving Strength, Power, Muscle Aerobic Capacity, and Glucose Tolerance through Short-term Progressive Strength Training Among Elderly People
Published on: July 5, 2017
07:30Muscle Imbalances: Testing and Training Functional Eccentric Hamstring Strength in Athletic Populations
Published on: May 1, 2018