Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Multidisciplinary Approach to Obesity Management: A Case Report
Published on: May 30, 2025
Evaluating the Consequences of a Hypertension Management Incentive
Claire Boone1, Ari Robicsek2,3
1Department of Economics and Department of Equity, Ethics, and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Financial incentives for hypertension control showed minimal impact on overall patient outcomes but led to increased documented control in specific subgroups due to selective blood pressure remeasurement. This approach also saw reduced medication adjustments and increased cardiovascular hospitalizations.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Clinical Quality Improvement
- Cardiovascular Medicine
Background:
- Financial incentives tied to quality metrics are common but their real-world impact on patient care is complex.
- Isolating the effects of these incentives on clinical decisions and patient health outcomes is a persistent challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the association between a physician-facing quality metric and financial incentive for hypertension control and subsequent clinical decisions and patient health outcomes.
- To evaluate the impact of financial incentives on hypertension management in a large US health system.
Main Methods:
- A quasi-experimental, difference-in-differences study design was employed in a large US health system.
- Compared outcomes at practices that adopted a hypertension control financial incentive versus those that did not, before and after incentive adoption (2021 vs. 2022-2023).
- Included patients aged 18-85 with diagnosed hypertension, analyzing blood pressure measurements, medication adjustments, and cardiovascular hospitalizations.
Main Results:
- The financial incentive was associated with a small increase in blood pressure remeasurement (1.9 pp) in the overall hypertensive population, with no significant changes in overall hypertension control, medication use, or cardiovascular hospitalizations.
- In patients with marginally high blood pressure (systolic 140-145 mm Hg), the incentive increased documented blood pressure control (4.1 pp) driven by increased remeasurement (5.6 pp).
- This subgroup also showed reduced antihypertensive medication dose adjustments (-1.1 pp) and a significant increase in 3-month hospitalization risk for stroke or acute coronary syndrome (0.25 pp), rising to 0.52 pp at 1 year.
Conclusions:
- The quality metric and financial incentive had minimal impact on measured outcomes for the general hypertensive population.
- For patients with marginally elevated blood pressure, the incentive led to increased documented control through selective measurement, decreased medication adjustments, and a concerning rise in cardiovascular hospitalizations.
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension V: Nursing Management
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure
Hypertension IV: Drug Therapy and Lifestyle Modifications
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Heart Failure V: Medical Management