Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Social Traps01:41

Social Traps

Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned more cows, the larger...
Understanding Deception01:14

Understanding Deception

Deception is a pervasive aspect of human communication. Empirical studies have shown that most individuals engage in some form of deceit on a daily basis, with approximately 20% of social exchanges involving deceptive elements. Lying follows a developmental trajectory, peaking during adolescence and declining with age, possibly due to the maturation of cognitive control and social accountability.Cognitive and Social Factors in Deception DetectionDespite its prevalence, accurately detecting...
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus: Comparing...
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension could be...
The Stanford Prison Experiment03:20

The Stanford Prison Experiment

The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
Dark Triad and Person Perception01:29

Dark Triad and Person Perception

Person perception is influenced by both external behaviors and the observer’s internal characteristics, including personality traits. Individuals with dark personality traits, comprising psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and narcissism — collectively known as the dark triad – exhibit manipulative and exploitative tendencies in social contexts. These traits affect how they perceive others and how they are perceived.The Role of Dark Personality Traits in Person PerceptionBlack et al. (2014) explored...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Epidemiological Profile of Repeated Self-Harm Presentations to Healthcare Services in a Brazilian Urban Centre (Vitoria, ES).

Crisis·2026
Same author

Organisational readiness and preparedness for trauma-informed practice across UK frontline services: a mixed-methods study.

European journal of psychotraumatology·2026
Same author

Psychological Flexibility and Experiential Avoidance as Moderators of the Relationship Between Entrapment and Suicidal Ideation Among LGBTQ+ Individuals in UK and US.

Archives of suicide research : official journal of the International Academy for Suicide Research·2026
Same author

Co-Creation, Translation, and Localization of a Trauma-Informed Digital Mental Health Intervention for Frontline Workers: Protocol for a Multi-Country Feasibility Study.

JMIR research protocols·2026
Same author

Understanding hoarding behaviours in the context of homelessness.

The British journal of clinical psychology·2026
Same author

A Systematic Review of Ecological Momentary Assessment Procedures of Self-Harm (With and Without Suicidal Intent) Studies in Adolescents and Young Adults.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Exploring the Factor and Network Structures of Defeat and Entrapment.

Kenvil Souza, Edward M Sosu, Tiago Zortea

    Archives of Suicide Research : Official Journal of the International Academy for Suicide Research
    |June 1, 2026
    PubMed
    Summary

    Defeat and entrapment are significant suicide risk factors. This study found that the structure of these constructs depends on the specific scales and statistical methods used, impacting interpretation.

    Keywords:
    Defeatexploratory graph analysis (EGA)external entrapmentintegrated motivational-volitional (IMV) modelinternal entrapment

    More Related Videos

    Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats
    15:01

    Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats

    Published on: January 18, 2013

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jun 3, 2026

    The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
    06:48

    The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

    Published on: January 19, 2019

    Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats
    15:01

    Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats

    Published on: January 18, 2013

    Area of Science:

    • Psychology
    • Mental Health Research
    • Suicidology

    Background:

    • Defeat and entrapment are recognized as critical risk factors associated with suicidal ideation and behavior.
    • The precise underlying structure and number of factors contributing to these constructs remain a subject of ongoing debate within the scientific community.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the dimensional structure of both short and long versions of defeat and entrapment scales.
    • To compare findings across different statistical methodologies, including exploratory factor analysis (EFA), exploratory graph analysis (EGA), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).

    Main Methods:

    • Utilized EFA and EGA on two independent general population samples (N1 = 502, N2 = 893).
    • Employed CFA on a separate sample (N = 251) to validate factor structures.
    • Examined the dimensionality of defeat and entrapment scales using robust statistical techniques.

    Main Results:

    • EFA and EGA supported a unidimensional (one-factor) model for the short defeat and entrapment scale.
    • EFA and EGA suggested a five-factor model for the full-length scales, interpreted as defeat, defeat (method), internal entrapment, external entrapment (people), and external entrapment (situation).
    • CFA results supported a three-factor model for the full scale and a one-factor model for the short scale.

    Conclusions:

    • The dimensional structure of defeat and entrapment scales is influenced by the specific measurement tools and analytical approaches employed.
    • Discrepancies in findings underscore the importance of carefully considering item content and methodological choices in future research on these suicide risk factors.