Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Patient-specific Modeling of the Heart: Estimation of Ventricular Fiber Orientations
Published on: January 8, 2013
Enhancing patient-specific computational modeling of cardiac mechanics by leveraging high spatiotemporal resolution
Mohsen Darayi1, Danielle Kara1, Hoa Le2
1Cardiovascular Innovation Research Center, Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Background And Objective:
Computational models of cardiac mechanics can improve diagnosis, surgical planning, and device design; yet their accuracy is limited by the quality of the underlying imaging data used in routine care. Our team recently reported a free-breathing, four-dimensional cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol (AutoCMR), which provides 30 volumetric frames per cardiac cycle at 1.6mm isotropic resolution. Here, we investigate whether this high spatiotemporal resolution imaging data, along with cuff systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP, DBP), improves non-invasive calibration and internal consistency of patient-specific 0D lumped-parameter and 3D finite element (FE) cardiac models.
Methods:
Five adults were imaged with the AutoCMR protocol. Every frame was segmented to obtain left ventricular (LV) and left atrial (LA) volume-time curves. These curves and SBP/DBP calibrated a closed-loop 0D model of LA, LV, and the systemic circulation. To assess the impact on key metrics, the LV elastance up-stroke exponent was varied, while all other calibrated parameters remained fixed. The resulting pressure-volume metrics included end-systolic elastance, effective arterial elastance, ventriculo-arterial coupling, stroke volume, ejection fraction, and stroke work. The calibrated parameters initialized a subject-specific 3D FE LV model.
Results:
Simulated chamber volumes closely matched MRI, with LV volume root mean square error (RMSE) of 5.55±1.13mL with R2=0.951 for 0D; and 7.76±1.65mL with R2=0.931 for 3D. Similarly, LA volume RMSE was 3.55±2.61mL with R2=0.976 for 0D and 4.32±2.64mL with R2=0.973 for 3D. Absolute LV peak-to-cuff systolic pressure target differences averaged 2.81±1.91mmHg (0D) and 4.81±1.10mmHg (3D), while absolute arterial diastolic pressure target differences were 1.64±1.33mmHg (0D) and 1.58±1.51mmHg (3D). In baseline-referenced sensitivity analysis, the 30-frame cine constraints kept mid-systolic LV pressure deviations ∼3-4 mmHg, compared to ∼18-25 mmHg when only end-diastolic and end-systolic constraints were used.
Conclusions:
Thirty-frame 3D cine MRI at 1.6mm isotropic resolution, combined with SBP/DBP, supported non-invasive calibration of 0D lumped parameter and 3D FE models with close in-sample agreement to MRI-derived volumes and cuff-pressure targets. The achieved in-sample agreement indicates that this AutoCMR-based simulation approach has the potential to support patient-specific computational assessments of cardiac function in clinical settings.
More Related Videos
12:24Noninvasive Assessment of Cardiac Abnormalities in Experimental Autoimmune Myocarditis by Magnetic Resonance Microscopy Imaging in the Mouse
Published on: June 20, 2014
11:13Quantification of Mouse Heart Left Ventricular Function, Myocardial Strain, and Hemodynamic Forces by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: May 24, 2021