Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

08:24
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Humans do not "play fair" with social robots: Unequal task sharing in an attentional task
Basil Wahn1, Khadija Bawari1, Eva Wiese1
1Institute of Psychology and Ergonomics, Technical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Acta Psychologica
|June 1, 2026
Summary
People offload attentionally demanding tasks to social robots like algorithms, not humans. Even with a human-like appearance, the social robot MAKI was treated as an algorithm, not a human partner.
Area of Science:
- Human-Computer Interaction
- Cognitive Science
- Robotics
Background:
- Artificial agents support daily tasks, but offloading attentionally demanding tasks is under-researched.
- Humans equally split attention with other humans but not algorithms.
- Social robots with human-like characteristics raise questions about human offloading decisions.
Purpose of the Study:
- Investigate how humans offload attentionally demanding tasks to social robots.
- Determine if social robots are treated as human or algorithmic partners in offloading.
- Examine the impact of known versus unknown robot accuracy on offloading.
Main Methods:
- Participants performed a multiple object tracking (MOT) task, offloading demands to a social robot (MAKI).
- Two experiments varied whether the robot's task accuracy was known or unknown.
- Offloading behavior and performance gains were measured.
Main Results:
- Participants significantly offloaded attentional demands to the robot, improving their own performance.
- Robot accuracy information did not impact offloading or performance gains.
- Participants did not equally split attention with the robot, unlike with human partners.
Conclusions:
- Social robots are treated similarly to algorithms, not human partners, for attention offloading.
- Human-like characteristics did not shift offloading behavior towards human interaction patterns.
- This suggests cognitive processing of social robots differs from human interaction partners.
Related Concept Videos
Stereotype Content Model
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence categorization, a person will feel...
Equity Theory
Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
Self-Serving Bias
Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...
Nonconscious Mimicry
Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
