Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Patient and Healthcare Provider Priorities for Risk Prediction of Hospital Readmission: A Nominal Group Technique
Robert Goldberg1, Taylor Hecker1, Bonnie Corradetti1
1Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Background:
Nearly one in ten hospitalized adults is readmitted within 30 days. Though many models exist to predict risk of hospital readmission, many perform poorly and do not address the priorities of patients or providers that use them. In this study, we aimed to identify their priorities to inform a readmission risk prediction framework.
Methods:
Using nominal group technique (NGT) methodology, we completed in-person and virtual meetings between February and April 2025 involving 22 total participants from Alberta, Canada. Participants included people with lived experience of a hospital readmission as a patient or caregiver as well as multidisciplinary healthcare providers. Discussions focused on the use of prediction tools, risk communication, and readmission type and relevant predictors. Priorities were collated, and each candidate suggestion within a topic was individually ranked by each participant indicating perceived importance. Priorities were then summarized and rank ordered using a mean standardized priority score.
Results:
Nine participants with lived experience (median age 56-65, 67% women, 33% rural) and 13 clinicians (median age group 36-45, 69% women, 77% physicians) participated in the meetings. Features most highly ranked by patients included using the tool to better inform patients and to plan discharge meetings, while those of clinicians focused on using a relevant time horizon, primarily risk of readmission ≤ 30 days, as well as presenting alerts of readmission risk within the patients' discharge summary. Both groups supported targeting all unplanned hospital readmissions and identified potential predictors including social determinants of health and laboratory markers. There were 163 total and 52 unique candidate predictors suggested, many of which were novel compared to existing models.
Conclusion:
Patients and healthcare providers prioritized key features for readmission risk prediction frameworks, many of which differ from existing models. These findings can be used to inform the development of novel tools tailored to user needs.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Planning Nursing Care I
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Patient-centered Care
Introduction To Health Care Delivery System
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) advocates for a patient-centered, effective, safe, timely, equitable, and effective healthcare system. The National Priorities...

