Related Experiment Videos

Predictive validity of daily sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA)-2 score for 30-day mortality

Johan Helleberg1,2, Anna Sundelin3,4, Navid Soltani1,5

  • 1Department of Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Abstract

Insights

The updated Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, SOFA-2, showed slightly better prediction of 30-day mortality on day 1 in the ICU compared to SOFA-1. Predictive accuracy decreased over time and varied by patient characteristics.

Area of Science:

  • Intensive care medicine
  • Clinical epidemiology
  • Health informatics

Background:

  • The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is a key tool for assessing organ dysfunction in intensive care units (ICUs).
  • Recent updates led to the development of SOFA-2, necessitating a comparison with the previous SOFA-1.
  • Understanding the predictive performance of SOFA-2 is crucial for contemporary critical care practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the predictive validity of the updated SOFA-2 and the previous SOFA-1 for 30-day mortality.
  • To evaluate performance over the first week in the ICU, considering overall patient populations and specific age/comorbidity subgroups.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective observational study included 29,820 adult ICU admissions in Sweden (2010-2021).
  • Predictive validity for 30-day mortality was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) from day 1 to day 7.
  • Analyses were conducted overall and within subgroups defined by age and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI).

Main Results:

  • SOFA-2 demonstrated a modestly higher AUROC (0.81) for 30-day mortality on ICU day 1 compared to SOFA-1 (0.80) (p < 0.001).
  • AUROCs for both scores declined from day 2 onwards and showed largely similar performance.
  • In specific subgroups like trauma patients, SOFA-2 showed good predictive validity (AUROC 0.81 on day 1), while sepsis patients had lower AUROCs (0.72 on day 1) for both scores.

Conclusions:

  • SOFA-2 offers a slight improvement in discriminating 30-day mortality on the first day of ICU admission compared to SOFA-1.
  • The predictive validity of both scores diminishes over the ICU stay and is influenced by patient age and comorbidity profiles.
  • These findings highlight the context-dependent nature of organ dysfunction scoring in critical care settings.