Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
Distinguishing regulatory variables and ecological affordances: Prioritizing goals versus implementing action
Edgar Dubourg1, Nicolas Baumard1
1Institut Jean Nicod, Département d'études cognitives, Ecole normale supérieure, Université PSL, EHESS, CNRS, Paris, France edgar.dubourg@gmail.com nbaumard@gmail.com https://www.edgardubourg.fr https://nicolasbaumard.org.
Abstract:
We fully share Ko and Neuberg's premises and conclusions. We only suggest that the framework could be further clarified by distinguishing two kinds of inputs: regulatory variables (cues that calibrate motivational salience) and affordances (local action possibilities that matter only once a motivation is already engaged).
Related Concept Videos
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Self-Regulation
Naturalistic Observations
Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable options,...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
