Related Experiment Videos
Factor Structures of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in Cancer: Implications of Comprehensive Confirmatory
Thilo Dietz1,2, Vera Schiewer2, Hildegard Labouvie2
1Chair of Medical Sociology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Background:
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a widely used instrument for assessing anxiety and depression in cancer patients. However, the best factor structure for an oncological setting depending on the time of diagnosis is still unclear.
Aim:
The objective of this study was to investigate the factor structure of the German-language version of the HADS in order to review the use of the HADS subscales and the HADS total scale in standard psycho-oncological care for cancer patients.
Method:
A secondary data analysis of N = 3395 cancer patients receiving psycho-oncological care was conducted to analyze 22 of the most common HADS factor models from the literature using confirmatory factor analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed using weighted least squares with mean and variance adjustment (WLSMV). Additionally, measurement invariance (MI) analysis was conducted.
Results:
The results indicate that two bifactorial models (Bifactor Model 1: higher-order factor + Anxiety and Depression subscale; Bifactor Model 2: higher-order factor + Restlessness, Anxiety, and Depression subscale) exhibit better quality than the original two-factorial structure (independent anxiety and depression scales) of the HADS (CFI: original structure = 0.970-0.971; Bifactor Model 1 = 0.987-0.988; Bifactor Model 2 = 0.990-0.991; TLI: original structure = 0.964-0.966; Bifactor Model 1 = 0.982; Bifactor Model 2 = 0.985-0.986; RMSEA: original structure = 0.082-0.086; Bifactor Model 1 = 0.065; Bifactor Model 2 = 0.053-0.054). The MI analysis revealed significant differences in performance between configural, metric, and scalar invariance for all three models.
Conclusion:
The results support the use of a bifactorial factor structure for the HADS-D, with the original Anxiety and Depression factors/scales operationalized, as well as an overarching factor in the form of the total sum score.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Panic Disorder
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
Generalized Anxiety Disorder