Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Precision Implementation of Minimal Erythema Dose (MED) Testing to Assess Individual Variation in Human Inflammatory Response
Published on: October 3, 2019
Active Ingredients Across the 10 Safewards Interventions: Expert Consensus Towards Fidelity Measurement
A Björkdahl1, L Berring2, G Brennan3,4
1Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm, Sweden.
This study developed a new tool to measure how well Safewards interventions are implemented in psychiatric settings. This will improve the reliability of research and clinical practice for Safewards.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry
- Mental Health Research
- Implementation Science
Background:
- Safewards is an international framework aimed at reducing conflict and containment in psychiatric settings.
- While generally effective, studies show variable outcomes, highlighting a need for better implementation fidelity measurement.
- Lack of a robust fidelity measure hinders replication, refinement, and rigorous evaluation of Safewards.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a new implementation fidelity tool for Safewards.
- To identify key active ingredients and measurement levels for the 10 Safewards interventions.
- To establish a foundation for a valid and reliable Safewards fidelity measure.
Main Methods:
- A Delphi survey with an international expert panel was used to achieve consensus on active ingredients and measurement levels.
- A preliminary list was derived from Safewards.net and implementation fidelity theory.
- The proposed tool was pilot tested with end-users in an acute psychiatric clinic and refined based on feedback.
Main Results:
- The study identified 48 active ingredients and 122 measurements across the 10 Safewards interventions.
- Each intervention includes three to seven statements and up to four measurement levels.
- The developed ingredients and measurements provide a conceptually and content-valid basis for a fidelity tool.
Conclusions:
- This work provides the first steps towards a new, valid Safewards implementation fidelity tool.
- The identified active ingredients offer practical guidance for clinicians implementing Safewards.
- Improved fidelity measurement will enhance clinical quality assurance and scientific rigor in Safewards research.
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this; it...
Accuracy and Precision
Quality Assurance
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
